Mantri Share Brokers v. CIT
96 Taxmann.com 279High Court2018#2224 most cited
What is Mantri Share Brokers v. CIT authority for?
An addition for undisclosed investments under Section 69B cannot be made solely based on a director's statement offering additional income during a survey, if no other corroborating material or evidence is found to support that statement. This principle was affirmed by the Supreme Court's dismissal of the revenue's Special Leave Petition.
52
judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2019 to 2026.
Also referred to as
Mantri Share Brokers v. CIT · Section 69B · undisclosed investments · statement during survey · no corroborating material · surrender of income · addition without evidence · SLP dismissed · burden of proof · retracted statement
Sections most often in play
Issues it is cited on
Judgments citing Mantri Share Brokers v. CIT
Showing 1–20 of 52 · Page 1 of 3