GOLDEN SOYA LTD,MUMBAI vs. ITO WD NO, 2(1)(4), MUMBAI
In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are treated as partly allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 574/MUM/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai13 Sept 2017AY 2011-12
Bench: Shri B.R. Baskaran (Am) I.T.A. No. 574/Mum/2017 (Assessment Year 2011-12) I.T.A. No. 573/Mum/2017 (Assessment Year 2010-11) I.T.A. No. 572/Mum/2017 (Assessment Year 2009-10) I.T.A. No. 571/Mum/2017 (Assessment Year 2008-09)
Section 57
…ther the above finding and approach is fortified with following decisions Sultan Bros. (Private)Ltd. v. CII, AIR 1964 SC 1389 : (1964) 51 ITR 353 (SC),reversing, (1960) 38 ITR 85 (Bom.): Addl. CIT v. Kanta Behan, (1982) 9 Taxman 24 : (1982) 27 CTR 40 : (1983) 140 ITR 187 6 Golden Soya Limited (Del); Cf. : D.C. Shah and others v. CII, (1979) 1 Taxman 545 : (1979) 118 ITR 419 (Karn); Addl. CIT v. National Newsprint and Paper Mills Ltd., (1978) 114 ITR 398 (MP). There are other decisions support the above findings: Income from the lease of machinery, which was purchased for the purpose of manufacturing but was ne…