Mahabir Prasad Rungta v. CIT, Ranchi

266 CTR 175High Court2014#3272 most cited

What is Mahabir Prasad Rungta v. CIT, Ranchi authority for?

Loose sheets seized during a search are considered 'documents' within the meaning of section 158B(b), and there is a presumption under section 132(4A) regarding such seized documents. The assessee must produce rebuttal evidence to disprove entries made in these loose sheets.

36

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2019 to 2025.

Also referred to as

Mahabir Prasad Rungta · CIT · Ranchi · 2014 · section 158B(b) · section 132(4A) · loose sheets · seized documents · presumption · rebuttal evidence · addition upheld

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Mahabir Prasad Rungta v. CIT, Ranchi

Showing 120 of 36 · Page 1 of 2

Mahabir Prasad Rungta v. CIT, Ranchi (266 CTR 175) — Cited in 36 Judgments | BharatTax