Limited v. Government of India

421 ITR 670High Court2020#7188 most cited
16

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2021 to 2026.

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Limited v. Government of India

SHRI. GURULINGESHWAR SOUHARD PATTIN SAHAKARI NIYAMIT SINDAGI,BIJAPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1 & TPS, BIJAPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purpsoes

ITA 1565/BANG/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore15 Oct 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri. Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri. Keshav Dubeyassessment Year : 2020-21 Ms. Shri Gurulingeshwar Souhard Pattin Sahakari Vs. Dcit - 3(3)(1), Niyamit Sindagi, Hmt Building, 1, Main Road, Bangalore. Sindagi – 586 128,Karnataka. Pan : Aajas 1983 N Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri. Veeranna M Murgod, Ca Revenue By : Shri. Subramanian S,Jcit(Dr)(Itat), Bangalore. Date Of Hearing : 07.10.2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 15.10.2025

For Appellant: Shri. Veeranna M Murgod, CAFor Respondent: Shri. Subramanian S,JCIT(DR)(ITAT), Bangalore
Section 143(2)Section 250Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)

…the Act for claim of deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) / 80P(2)(d) of the Act, assessee is eligible for deduction as per judgment of Hon’ble jurisdictional High Court. in the case of Swabhimani Souharda Credit Co-operative v. UoI [2020] 122 taxmann.com 37/421 ITR 670 (Karnataka) in which it has been held as under: "5. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and having perused the petition papers, this Court is of a considered opinion that the answer to the above question needs to be in the affirmative for the following reasons: (a) sec. 80P of the 1961 Act provides for deduction in respect of income…

SHREE SHARANAVASACESHWAR CREDIT SOUHARD SAHAKARI NI HALINGALI,HALINGALI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, BAGALKOT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 154/BANG/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore12 Aug 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Keshav Dubeyassessment Year : 2016-17 Shree Sharanabasaveshwar Credit Souhard Sahakari Ni Halingali Ito Tq Jamkhandi, Dt Bagalkot Vs. Ward-1 Halingali, Karnataka 587315 Bagalkot Pan No :Aaeas6699C Appellant Respondent Appellant By : Sri Sandeep Chalapathy, A.R. Respondent By : Sri Subramanian S., D.R. Date Of Hearing : 14.05.2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 12.08.2025 O R D E R Per Keshav Dubey: This Appeal At The Instance Of The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of The Ld. Cit(A)/Nfac Dated 07.11.2024 Vide Din & Order No. Itba/Nfac/S/250/2024-25/1070176573(1) Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (In Short “The Act”) For The Assessment Year 2016-17. 2. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Ground Of Appeal: -

For Appellant: Sri Sandeep Chalapathy, A.RFor Respondent: Sri Subramanian S., D.R
Section 143(3)Section 250Section 271(1)(c)Section 274Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)

…e Karnataka High Court, therefore we are of the opinion that the issue in the present case is debatable one and assessee by relying on the decision of the Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in the case of Swabhimani Souharda Credit Co. operative Ltd. v. CBDT [2020] 421 ITR 670 had categorically held that the entity registered under the Karnataka Souharda Sahakari Act, 1997 fit into the definition of “Cooperative Society” as enacted in section 2(19) of the Act and therefore subject to all just exceptions they are entitled to seek their claim for the benefit of section 80P of the said Act. Therefore, in our opinion Shree…

THE VILLUPURAM DISTRICT CONSUMER COOPERATIVE WHOLESALE STORES LTD.,,VILLUPURAM vs. ACIT, , VILLUPURAM

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue & Assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 667/CHNY/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai08 Jun 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 01 & 02/Chny/2021 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years: 2011-12 & 2012–13 The Acit, The Villupuram District Circle-1, V. Consumer Co-Operative Cuddalore Wholesale Stores Ltd., No.20, Poonthamalli Street, Villupuram – 605 602. Pan: Aabat 1251G (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) & C.O. Nos.: 04 & 05/Chny/2022 (In I.T.A. Nos. 01 & 02/Chny/2021) िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years: 2011-12 & 2012 – 13 The Villupuram District The Acit, Consumer Co-Operative V. Circle-1, Wholesale Stores Ltd., Cuddalore No.20, Poonthamalli Street, Villupuram – 605 602. Pan: Aabat 1251G (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) & आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 667/Chny/2020 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year: 2016-17 The Villupuram District The Acit, Consumer Co-Operative V. Villupuram Circle, Wholesale Stores Ltd., Villupuram No.20, Poonthamalli Street, Villupuram – 605 602. Pan: Aabat 1251G (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri J. Prabhakar, CAFor Respondent: Shri AR.V. Sreenivasan, Addl.CIT
Section 143(3)

…s Co- operative Societies per-se in accordance with purposive construction of section 80 P read with section 2(19) of the Act. 5. The learned CIT (Appeals) is ought to have relied upon the judicial aictum rendered in [2017] 392 ITR 74 (Kar) as well as [2020] 421 ITR 670 (Kar). 6. The learned CIT (Appeals) failed to notice that the restrictions imposed under section 80(P)(4) affects only the receipts or income of the Co- operative Bank per se and not the interest expended by such bank in favour of the appellant herein as a Co- operative Society. 7. The learned CIT (Appeals) is not justified in approving the lin…