PUSHPA VIDYA NIKETAN SAMITI,,KOTA vs. ACITDCIT,CENTRAL CIRCLE, KOTA, KOTA
ITA 315/JPR/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur24 Mar 2025AY 2017-18
Bench: Dr. S. Seethalakshmi & Shri Gagan Goyal
For Appellant: Mr. Mahendra Gargieya, Adv. &For Respondent: Mr. Anup Singh, Addl. CIT- Ld. DR
Section 11Section 131Section 133ASection 234BSection 250
…which are not there. The intention of the legislature is primarily to be gathered from the words used in the statute. Once the assessee comes within the letter of law he must be taxed. In the case of L.P. Cardoza v. Agrl. ITO [1998] 144 CTR (Kar) 474: [1997] 227 ITR 421 (Kar), it has been held by Hon'ble Karnataka High Court that while interpreting a provision in a tax law wherein a legal fiction is created, such provision will have to be strictly interpreted. In the case of Orissa State Warehousing Corporation v. CIT [1999] 153 CTR (SC) 177: [1999] 237 ITR 589 (SC), it has been held that a fiscal statute shall…