Krishan Kumar Jhamb v. I.T.O High Court of Punjab & Harayna

179 Taxmann 141Reported decision2009#19665 most cited
4

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2025.

Judgments citing Krishan Kumar Jhamb v. I.T.O High Court of Punjab & Harayna

BALWANT SIINGH,BATHINDA vs. DCITACIT(CEN)-2, CHANDIGARH

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is allowed

ITA 850/CHANDI/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh10 Sept 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: SHRI. RAJPAL YADAV (Vice President), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY, AM Balwant Singh आयकर अपील सं. / ITA No. 850/Chd/2024 निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Years : 2017-18 H.No. 93-94, Model Town, Bathinda Punjab-151001 स्थायी लेखा सं./ PAN NO: BZAPS9230A अपीलार्थी/ Appellant निर्धारिती की ओर से/Assessee by : राजस्व की ओर से/ Revenue by : सुनवाई की तारीख / Date of Hearing: उदघोषणा की तारीख/Date of Pronouncement : आदेश/Order PER KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Rohit Kapoor, Advocate &For Respondent: Shri Manav Bansal, CIT, DR
Section 132Section 153A

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण,च"ीगढ़ "ायपीठ “ए” , च"ीगढ़ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH BENCH “A”, CHANDIGARH HEARING THROUGH: PHYSICAL MODE "ी राजपाल यादव, उपा"" एवं "ी कृणव" सहाय, लेखा सद" BEFORE: SHRI. RAJPAL YADAV, VP & SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY, AM आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 850/Chd/ 2024 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2017-18 Balwant Singh बनाम The DCIT ACIT(Cen)-2 H.No. 93-94, Model Town, Bathinda Chandigarh Punjab-151001 "ायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: BZAPS9230A अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""थ"/Respondent िनधा"रती की ओर से/Assessee by : Shri Rohit Kapoor, Advocate & Shri Virsain Aggarwal, ITP राज" की ओर से/ Revenue by : Shr…

OM PRAKASH SINGH,ALLAHABAD vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, , ALLAHABAD

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed

ITA 114/ALLD/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad27 Dec 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Sh. Udayan Das Gupta & Sh. Nikhil Choudharya.Y. 2017-18 Om Prakash Singh, Vs. Assistant Commissioner Of 147A/2, Tagore Town, J.L.N. Income Tax, Central Circle, Road, Allahabad, U.P. Allahabad, U.P. Pan:Aiepp0574G (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Sh. Ashish Bansal, Adv Revenue By: Sh. A.K. Singh, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing: 01.10.2024 Date Of Pronouncement: 27.12.2024 O R D E R Per Nikhil Choudhary, A.M.: This Is An Appeal Against The Order Of The Ld. Cit(A)-, Lucknow-3, Dated 11.07.2023 Passed Under Section 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961. The Grounds Of Appeal Preferred Are As Under:- “1. Because Proceeding Under Section 147 Of The Act By Issuance Of Notice Dated 30.03.2021 Under Section 148 On The Basis Of D.V.O. Report His Only Erroneous & Bad, Assessment Order Dated 23.03.2022 Passed In Consequence Of Said Proceeding Is Wholly Without Jurisdiction, Accordingly, The Entire Proceeding In Consequence Of Notice Dated 30.03.2021 Are Vitiated & Not Maintainable. Without Prejudice To The Aforesaid 2. Because The Addition Of Rs.9,26,796/- Made By The Ld. Assessing Officer On Account Of Alleged Difference In The Valuation Of Office Building Between The Value Appearing In The Audited Books Of Account As Compared To The Valuation Made By The D.V.O., As Also Confirm By The Id. Cit(A), Is Wholly Erroneous As The Report Of The Valuation Officer Is An Estimate & The Same

For Appellant: Sh. Ashish Bansal, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. A.K. Singh, Sr. DR
Section 115BSection 133ASection 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 69

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ALLAHABAD BENCH, ALLAHABAD BEFORE SH. UDAYAN DAS GUPTA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER A.Y. 2017-18 Om Prakash Singh, vs. Assistant Commissioner of 147A/2, Tagore Town, J.L.N. Income Tax, Central Circle, Road, Allahabad, U.P. Allahabad, U.P. PAN:AIEPP0574G (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by: Sh. Ashish Bansal, Adv Revenue by: Sh. A.K. Singh, Sr. DR Date of hearing: 01.10.2024 Date of pronouncement: 27.12.2024 O R D E R PER NIKHIL CHOUDHARY, A.M.: This is an appeal against the order of the ld. CIT(A)-, Lucknow-3, dated 11.07.2023 passed under…

Krishan Kumar Jhamb v. I.T.O High Court of Punjab & Harayna (179 Taxmann 141) — Cited in 4 Judgments | BharatTax