CONFEDERATION OF INDIAN TEXTILE INDUSTRY ,MUMBAI vs. ITO (E) 1(2), MUMBAI
In the result, we hereby set-aside the order of CIT(A) and the Assessing
ITA 2435/MUM/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai17 Jul 2020AY 2013-14
Bench: Shri M.Balaganesh, Am & Shri Amarjit Singh, Jm M/S. Confederation Of Indian Vs. Ito(E)(1)(2), Mumbai Textile Industry 1508, Maker Chamber V-221 Nariman Point Mumbai – 400 021 Pan/Gir No.Aaact0174H (Appellant) .. (Respondent)
Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 25
…ders dealing in photographic and connected trades [CIT v. South Indian Photographic & Allied Trades Association [1987] 166 ITR 166/[1986] 26 Taxman 485 (Mad.) and an association consisting of Kirana Merchants (Madras Kirana Merchants Association v. CIT [1978] 111 ITR 156) were held by the Madras High Court to be eligible for the exemption under Section 11 notwithstanding that some of the associations charged their members fees for specific services rendered. Other cases on similar lines are: NAME OF CASE CITATION ASSOCIATION OF Banaras Brass (2000) 241 ITR 70/117 Brass Merchant and Merchant and Taxman 568 (All.)…