Khurana Engg. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT

217 Taxmann 75High Court2013#17305 most cited
5

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2018 to 2025.

Judgments citing Khurana Engg. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT

INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 6(2)(1), MUMBAI, INCOME TAX OFFICE, MUMBAI vs. ESSAR POWER JAMNAGAR LIMITED, MUMBAI

ITA 2463/MUM/2024[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai19 Nov 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Anikesh Banerjee & Shri Girish Agrawalassessment Year: 2011-12 Income Tax Officer, Essar Power Jamnagar Ltd., Ward 6(2)(1), 11, Essar House, K.K. Marg, Vs. Mumbai Mahalaxmi, Mumbai – 400 034 (Pan : Aabce8921G) (Assessee) (Respondent) Present For: Assessee : Shri Vijay Mehta, Ca Revenue : Shri Biswanath Das, Cit, Dr Date Of Hearing : 05.09.2024 Date Of Pronouncement : 19.11.2024 O R D E R Per Girish Agrawal: This Appeal Filed By The Revenue Is Against The Order Of Ld. Cit(A), National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi Vide Order No. Itba/Nfac/S/250/2023-24/1062839468(1), Dated 18.03.2024 Passed Against The Assessment Order By Income Tax Officer, Ward – 6(2)(4), U/S. 144 R.W.S. 147 Of The Income-Tax Act (Hereinafter Referred To As The “Act”), Dated 29.03.2016 For Assessment Year 2011-12. 2. Grounds Taken By The Revenue Are Reproduced As Under: "1. Whether On The Facts & In The Circumstances Of The Case, The Ld. Citia) Was Justified In Declaring The Assessment Order Passed As Nullity Without Considering The Fact That The Assessee Was In Existence When The Transactions Were Made? 2. "Whether On The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case, The Ld. Citia) Was Justified In Treating The Assessment Proceedings As Without Jurisdiction, Without Considering The Fact That The Reference Can Be Made For Revival Of Companies From The Date Of Strike Off, As Per The Instruction By The Cbdt Vide Letter Dated 29.12.2017?

For Appellant: Shri Vijay Mehta, CAFor Respondent: Shri Biswanath Das, CIT, DR
Section 144Section 148Section 560

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “E” BENCH MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI ANIKESH BANERJEE, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI GIRISH AGRAWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year: 2011-12 Income Tax Officer, Essar Power Jamnagar Ltd., Ward 6(2)(1), 11, Essar House, K.K. Marg, Vs. Mumbai Mahalaxmi, Mumbai – 400 034 (PAN : AABCE8921G) (Assessee) (Respondent) Present for: Assessee : Shri Vijay Mehta, CA Revenue : Shri Biswanath Das, CIT, DR Date of Hearing : 05.09.2024 Date of Pronouncement : 19.11.2024 O R D E R PER GIRISH AGRAWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: This appeal filed by the Revenue is against the order of Ld. CIT(A), National Faceles…

ACIT 9(3)(2), MUMBAI vs. GLINT INFRAPORJECTS P.LTD, MUMBAI

In the result, the Revenue’s appeal is dismissed and the cross objection of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 3594/MUM/2017[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai25 Sept 2020AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Amarjit Singhassessment Year: 2007-08 Dcit 9(3)(2), M/S. Glint Infraprojects 418, 4Th Floor, Pvt. Ltd., Aayakar Bhavan, (Keystone Stockfin Pvt Mumbai - 400020 Ltd. Merged In Glint Vs. Infraprojects Pvt. Ltd.), 5Th Floor, Sunteck Centre, 37-40, Subhash Road, Vile Parle (E), Mumbai – 400 057 Pan: Aadcg 5620L (Appellant) (Respondent) Co No.277/M/2018 (Arising Out Of Ita No.3594/M/2017) Assessment Year: 2007-08 M/S. Glint Infraprojects Dcit 9(3)(2), Pvt. Ltd., 418, 4Th Floor, (Keystone Stockfin Pvt Aayakar Bhavan, Ltd. Merged In Glint Mumbai - 400020 Infraprojects Pvt. Ltd.), Vs. 5Th Floor, Sunteck Centre, 37-40, Subhash Road, Vile Parle (E), Mumbai – 400 057 Pan: Aadcg 5620L (Appellant) (Respondent) Present For: Assessee By : Shri Rakesh Joshi, A.R. Revenue By : Shri V. Vinod Kumar, D.R. Date Of Hearing : 23.09.2020 Date Of Pronouncement : 25.09.2020 O R D E R Per Rajesh Kumar: The Present Appeal Has Been Preferred By The Revenue Against The Order Dated 03.02.2017 Of The Commissioner Of 2 M/S. Glint Infraprojects Pvt. Ltd. Income Tax (Appeals) [Hereinafter Referred To As The Cit(A)] Relevant To Assessment Year 2007-08. Besides The Assessee Has Challenged The Jurisdiction Of The Ao To Re-Open & Frame Assessment On Legal Grounds By Way Of Cross Objections.

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Joshi, A.RFor Respondent: Shri V. Vinod Kumar, D.R
Section 144Section 147Section 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH “G”, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year: 2007-08 DCIT 9(3)(2), M/s. Glint Infraprojects 418, 4th Floor, Pvt. Ltd., Aayakar Bhavan, (Keystone Stockfin Pvt Mumbai - 400020 Ltd. Merged in Glint Vs. Infraprojects Pvt. Ltd.), 5th Floor, Sunteck Centre, 37-40, Subhash Road, Vile Parle (E), Mumbai – 400 057 PAN: AADCG 5620L (Appellant) (Respondent) CO No.277/M/2018 (Arising out of ITA No.3594/M/2017) Assessment Year: 2007-08 M/s. Glint Infraprojects DCIT 9(3)(2), Pvt. Ltd., 418, 4th Floor, (Keysto…

MADHAV GOVIND DHULSHETE,,LATUR vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER,,

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical

ITA 2148/PUN/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Pune28 Feb 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri D.Karunakara Rao, Am & Shri Vikas Awasthy, Jm आयकर आयकर अपील आयकर आयकर अपील अपील संसंसंसं. / Ita No.2146/Pun/2016 अपील िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष" / Assessment Year : 2009-10 वष"

For Appellant: Shri Bharat RaichandaniFor Respondent: Dr. Vivek Aggarwal, CIT-DR
Section 271DSection 40A(3)

…पुणे "यायपीठ "यायपीठ "यायपीठ “बी "यायपीठ पुणे म"म"म"म" आयकर आयकर अपीलीय आयकर आयकर अपीलीय अपीलीय अिधकरण अपीलीय अिधकरण अिधकरण, पुणे अिधकरण पुणे पुणे बी बी” पुणे बी पुणे पुणे IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PUNE BENCH “B”, PUNE "ी "ी डी "ी "ी डी. क"णाकरा क"णाकरा क"णाकरा राव क"णाकरा लेखा सद"य सद"य सद"य सद"य डी डी राव राव , लेखा राव लेखा लेखा एवं "ी "ी "ी िवकास "ी िवकास अव"थी अव"थी अव"थी, "याियक अव"थी "याियक "याियक सद"य "याियक सद"य सद"य केकेकेके सम" सद"य सम" सम" सम" एवं एवं एवं िवकास िवकास BEFORE SHRI D.KARUNAKARA RAO, AM AND SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY, JM आयकर आयकर अपील आयकर आयकर अपील अपील संसंसंसं. / ITA No.2146/PUN/20…

Khurana Engg. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (217 Taxmann 75) — Cited in 5 Judgments | BharatTax