Kerala State Beverages Manufacturing and Marketing Corporation Ltd. v. ACIT

134 Taxmann.com 11Supreme Court of India2022#6797 most cited
17

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2022 to 2025.

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Kerala State Beverages Manufacturing and Marketing Corporation Ltd. v. ACIT

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ODISHA vs. ODISHA STATE BEVERAGES CORPORATION LIMITED, ODISHA

In the result, appeal of the revenue stands dismissed

ITA 359/CTK/2023[2020-21]Status: HeardITAT Cuttack11 Jun 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Before Shri George Mathan, Judicial & Manish Agarwal Manish Agarwalassessment Year : 2020-2021 2021 Dcit, Aayakar Bhavan, Main Dcit, Aayakar Bhavan, Main Vs. Odisha Odisha State State Beverages Beverages 2Nd Building, Building, Rajaswas Rajaswas Vihar, Vihar, Corporation Corporation Limited., Limited., 2 Vani Vihar, Bhubaneswar. Vani Vihar, Bhubaneswar. Floor, Floor, Fortune Fortune Towers, Towers, S.E.Rly S.E.Rly Proj. Proj. Complex, Complex, Bhubaneswar. Bhubaneswar. Pan/Gir No Pan/Gir No. (Appellant (Appellant) .. ( Respondent Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Satyajit Mishra, Ca Satyajit Mishra, Ca Revenue By : Shri Sanjay Kumar, Cit : Shri Sanjay Kumar, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing : 11/0 06/2024 Date Of Pronouncement : 11/0 /06/2024 O R D E R Per Bench This Is An Appeal Filed By The Revenue Against The Order Of The Ld Against The Order Of The Ld Cit(A), Nfac, Delhi Dated Cit(A), Nfac, Delhi Dated 21.9.2023 Deleting The Penalty Levied U/S.270A Of 21.9.2023 Deleting The Penalty Levied U/S.270A Of The Act For The Assessment Year For The Assessment Year 2020-2021. 2. Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Assessment In This Case Was Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Assessment In This Case Was Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Assessment In This Case Was Passed U/S.143(3) Of The Act On 23.9.2 Passed U/S.143(3) Of The Act On 23.9.2022 By Disallowing A Sum Of 022 By Disallowing A Sum Of Rs.3,00,00,000/ Rs.3,00,00,000/- Out Of Expenses Claimed By The Assessee On Account Of Out Of Expenses Claimed By The Assessee On Account Of License Fees U/S.40(A)(Iib) Of The Act. Simultaneously, Penalty Proceedings License Fees U/S.40(A)(Iib) Of The Act. Simultaneously, Penalty Proceedings License Fees U/S.40(A)(Iib) Of The Act. Simultaneously, Penalty Proceedings

For Appellant: Shri Satyajit Mishra, CAFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Kumar, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 270ASection 270A(1)Section 270A(9)Section 40

…Orissa High Court. Likewise, the appeals for other assessment years were pending before the various appellate forums. In the meanwhile, the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Kerala State Beverages Manufacturing and Marketing Corporation Ltd. v. ACIT (2022) 440 ITR 492 has settled the issue and accordingly, the assessee has not challenge the disallowance made in the year under appeal and also withdrawn the appeals for the earlier assessment years also. Besides this, the assessee company for the impugned assessment year has paid the tax within a period of 30 days from the creation of demand against the said disa…

ANDHRA PRADESH POWER GENRATION CORPORATION LIMITED,VIJAYAWADA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,, CIRCLE-1(1), VIJAYAWADA

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 101/VIZ/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam28 May 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No.101/Viz/2022 (निर्धारणवर्ा/ Assessment Year : 2017-18) Andhra Pradesh Power Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Generation Corporation Limited, Income Tax, Vijayawada. Circle-1(1), Pan: Aacca 2734 J Vijayawada. (अपीलधर्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) अपीलधर्थीकीओरसे/ Assessee By : Sri M. Chandramouleswara Rao, Ar प्रत्यधर्थीकीओरसे/ Revenue By : Dr. Satyasai Rath, Cit-Dr

For Appellant: Sri M. ChandramouleswaraFor Respondent: Dr. Satyasai Rath, CIT-DR
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 40Section 80ISection 9

…the Act by wrongly interpreting the section 40(a)(iib) of the Act. The Ld. AR placed heavy reliance on the ratio laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Kerala State Beverages Manufacturing & Marketing Corporation Ltd vs. ACIT reported in [2022] 440 ITR 492 (SC) and also relied on the decision of the Coordinate Bench of the ITAT at Chennai in the case of M/s. Tamilnadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd vs. ACIT in ITA No. 353/Chny/2022 (AY 2014-15), dated 14/11/2022. The Ld. AR also relied on G.O.M.S. No. 39, dated 02/04/2022 and G.O.M.S. No. 76, dated 9/8/2010 in support of his contentions. Per cont…

Kerala State Beverages Manufacturing and Marketing Corporation Ltd. v. ACIT (134 Taxmann.com 11) — Cited in 17 Judgments | BharatTax