Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Ltd. v. DCIT

383 ITR 59High Court2016#1766 most cited

What is Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Ltd. v. DCIT authority for?

Tax must be deducted at source under Section 194A only on interest that ultimately partakes the character of income for the recipient. If interest does not qualify as income or falls outside the scope of Section 2(28A), there is no obligation to deduct TDS.

64

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2016 to 2024.

Also referred to as

Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Ltd v DCIT · Section 194A · Section 2(28A) · TDS on interest · obligation to deduct tax at source · interest as income · character of income · interest definition · tax deduction on interest payments · income tax deduction at source

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Ltd. v. DCIT

CITICORP TRUSTEE COMPANY LTD AS TRUSTEE FOR FCCB ISSUED BY JINDAL SAW LTD,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INT TAXATION)-2(1)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 784/MUM/2023[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai21 Aug 2023AY 2014-2015

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Am आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No. 784/Mum/2023 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2014-15) Citicorp Trustee Company बिधम/ Dcit (International Ltd. As Trustee For Fccb Taxation)-2(1)(1) Vs. Issued By Jindal Saw Ltd. 17Th Floor, 1713, Air India Citigroup Centre, Canada Building, Nariman Point, Square, Canary Wharf Mumbai-400021. London E14 5Lb United Kingdom. स्थधयी लेखध सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaecc0452D (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) Assessee By: Shri Anish Thackar/Nikhil Tiwari/Lekh Mehta Revenue By: Shri Amit Kumar Soni (Sr. Dr) सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing: 19/07/2023 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 21/08/2023 आदेश / O R D E R Per Aby T. Varkey, Jm: This Is An Appeal Preferred By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Assessing Officer (Ao) Dated 19.01.2023 Passed U/S 143(3) R.W.S. 144C(13) R.W.S 147 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter “The Act”). 2. At The Outset, The Ld. Ar Of The Assessee Brought To Our Notice The Ground No. 2 Wherein The Assessee Has Raised The Legal Issue Against The Action Of The Ao To Have Reopened The Assessment U/S 147 Of The Act Without Satisfying The Essential Condition Prescribed Under The Act; & Therefore Contends That The Action Of The Ao Is Ab-Initio-Void. 3. In Order To Examine The Legal Issue Raised By The Assessee, It Is Necessary To Look Into The Reasons Recorded By Ao To Reopen The Assessment Which Is Reproduced As Under: -

For Appellant: Shri Anish Thackar/NikhilFor Respondent: Shri Amit Kumar Soni (Sr. DR)
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 201(1)Section 5(2)(b)Section 6

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “I” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI ABY T. VARKEY, JM AND SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, AM आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No. 784/Mum/2023 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2014-15) Citicorp Trustee Company बिधम/ DCIT (International Ltd. As Trustee for FCCB Taxation)-2(1)(1) Vs. issued by Jindal Saw Ltd. 17th Floor, 1713, Air India CitiGroup Centre, Canada Building, Nariman Point, Square, Canary Wharf Mumbai-400021. London E14 5LB United Kingdom. स्थधयी लेखध सं./जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No. : AAECC0452D (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) Assessee by: Shri Anish Thackar/Nikhil Tiwari/Lekh…

Showing 120 of 64 · Page 1 of 4

Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Ltd. v. DCIT (383 ITR 59) — Cited in 64 Judgments | BharatTax