Kanoi Paper and Industries Ltd. v. ACIT

75 TTJ 448Income Tax Appellate Tribunal2002#965 most cited

What is Kanoi Paper and Industries Ltd. v. ACIT authority for?

The obligation to deposit employees' contributions to welfare funds, such as provident fund, arises from the date of actual disbursement of salary, not merely upon the accrual of salary liability. Consequently, the due dates for depositing such contributions are calculated from the date salary is disbursed.

111

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2026.

Also referred to as

Kanoi Paper and Industries Ltd v ACIT · Section 36(1)(va) · Section 2(24)(x) · employees contribution to PF · due date of deposit · disbursement of salary · salary accrual · disallowance under Section 143(1) · timing of deposit · labour Acts.

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Kanoi Paper and Industries Ltd. v. ACIT

INTELLIGENT COMMUNICATION SYSTEM INDIA LIMITED,DELHI vs. ITO,WARD-12(1), DELHI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed ex parte for statistical purposes

ITA 5532/DEL/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi03 Jun 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri S.Rifaur Rahman & Shri Vimal Kumarintelligent Communication System India Ltd., Vs. Ito, Ward 12 (1), First Floor, Administrative Building, Delhi. Okhla Industrial Estate, Delhi – 110 020. (Pan : Aaaci0691N) (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Farhat Miyan, Ca Revenue By : Shri Om Prakash, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 03.06.2025 Date Of Order : 03.06.2025 O R D E R Per S. Rifaur Rahman: 1. The Assessee Has Filed The Appeal Against The Order Of The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi [“Ld. Cit(A)”, For Short] Dated 30.09.2024 For The Assessment Year 2017-18 Raising Following Grounds Of Appeal :- “On The Fact & Circumstances Of The Case & In Law The Ld. Nfac Has Erred In Confirming The Disallowance Of The Rs.1,38,75,883/- Under Section 36(1)(Va) Of The Income Tax Act. The Action Of The Ld. National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac) & Ld. Centralized Processing Centre (Cpc) Is Wrong, Misconceived & Unjustified Therefore It Should Be Quashed.”

For Appellant: Shri Farhat Miyan, CAFor Respondent: Shri Om Prakash, Sr. DR
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 36Section 36(1)(va)

…he accrual of liability towards payment of salary without actual disbursement would not fasten obligation for deposits of employees contribution in the labour Acts per se. as observed by the co-ordinate bench in Kanoi Paper and Industries Ltd. vs. ACIT (2002) 75 TTJ 448 (Cal). This aspect has not been found to be examined by the Assessing Officer or CIT(A). Hence without expressing any opinion on merits on this aspect, we deem it expedient to restore the matter to the file of designated AO. It shall be open to the assessee to place factual matrix before the AO and take such plea for evaluation of the AO. The AO s…

TARSEM CHAND RANA,UNA vs. JURISDICTIONAL ASSESSING OFFICER, ITO WARD 98, UNA, RANGE CODE 37, UNA

In the result, the appeal of the Assessee is dismissed

ITA 1085/CHANDI/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh02 Jun 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Shri Krinwant Sahayआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 1085/Chd/2024 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2020-21 Tarsem Singh Rana, Ito, बनाम H.No. 4, Kathoh, Ward 98, Khurwain, Una Vs. Bangana H.P. 174321 "थायी लेखा सं./Pan No: Aawpr5715R अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent ( Hybrid Hearing ) "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee By : Sh. Ajit Kumar Jha, Advocate (Virtual Mode) राज"व क" ओर से/ Revenue By : Dr. Ranjit Kaur, Addl. Cit, Sr.Dr

For Appellant: Sh. Ajit Kumar Jha, AdvocateFor Respondent: Dr. Ranjit Kaur, Addl. CIT, Sr.DR
Section 143(1)Section 154Section 2(24)(x)Section 250Section 36(1)(va)

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, च"डीगढ़ "यायपीठ, च"डीगढ़ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CHANDIGARH BENCH, ‘B’, CHANDIGARH BEFORE SHRI LALIET KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI KRINWANT SAHAY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 1085/CHD/2024 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2020-21 Tarsem Singh Rana, ITO, बनाम H.No. 4, Kathoh, Ward 98, Khurwain, Una Vs. Bangana H.P. 174321 "थायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AAWPR5715R अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent ( Hybrid Hearing ) "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee by : Sh. Ajit Kumar Jha, Advocate (Virtual mode) राज"व क" ओर से/ Revenue by : Dr. Ranjit Kaur, Addl. CIT, Sr.DR सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date…

RANBIR SINGH,HARYANA vs. WARD-2, AMBALA, RANGE CODE-65, AO NUMBER-94, JURISDICTIONAL ASSESSING OFFICER, HARYANA

In the result, Assessee’s penalty is dismissed

ITA 851/CHANDI/2024[2021-2022]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh27 May 2025AY 2021-2022

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Shri Krinwant Sahayआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 851/Chd/2024 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2021-22 Ranbir Singh, Ao, बनाम K203,2Nd Floor, Awho, Ward-2, Vikram Vihar, Sector 27, Ambala. Vs. Panchkula, Haryana-134116 "थायी लेखा सं./Pan No: Avwps0410K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent ( Physical Hearing ) "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee By : Shri Hemant Jain, Advocate राज"व क" ओर से/ Revenue By : Sh. Ved Parkash Kalia, Sr. Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 12.03.2025 उदघोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 26.05.2025 आदेश/Order Per Krinwant Sahay, Am : Appeal In This Case Has Been Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 14-06-2024 Of Ld. Addl /Jcit (Appeals), Mudurai Folder For A.Y. 2021-22. 2. Grounds Of Appeal Are As Under: -

For Appellant: Shri Hemant Jain, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. Ved Parkash Kalia, Sr. DR
Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 2(24)(x)Section 36Section 36(1)Section 43BSection 851

…) of the Act r.w.s 224(x) of the I.T. Act for late deposit in the government account. During the proceedings before us, the Ld. Counsel emphasized on the order of the Kolkata Bench of the ITAT in the case of Kanoi Papers and Industries Ltd vs ACIT reported in 75 TTJ 448. In this order the Tribunal has held that “….15 days from the end of the month in which salary actually disbursed, the Tribunal has held that 'Clause 38 of the Employees' Provident Fund 851-Chd-2024 Ranbir Singh, Panchkula 6 Scheme, 1952, fixes the time-limit for making payment in respect of contribution to the provident fund to be 15 days from t…

Showing 120 of 111 · Page 1 of 6

Kanoi Paper and Industries Ltd. v. ACIT (75 TTJ 448) — Cited in 111 Judgments | BharatTax