Kamataka Power Corp. 247 ITR 268 (SC) Paper Book Pages 32 to 35 2. CIT v. Singareni Collieries Co.

221 ITR 194High Court1995#6423 most cited
18

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2023.

Judgments citing Kamataka Power Corp. 247 ITR 268 (SC) Paper Book Pages 32 to 35 2. CIT v. Singareni Collieries Co.

ACIT, CIRCLE-9(3)(1), MUMBAI vs. M/S. FEDEX EXPRESS TRANSPORTATION & SUPPLY SERVICES (I) PVT. LTD, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 5509/MUM/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai06 Sept 2021AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalacit, Circle – 9(3)(1) Vs. M/S. Fedex Express Room No. 215, 2Nd Transportation & Floor, Aayakar Bhavan, Supply Services (I) Pvt Mk Road, Mumbai – Ltd., 400020. A-Wing, Boomerang Bldg., Chandivali Farm Road, Andheri (E) Mumbai - 400072 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aabcf6516A Appellant .. Respondent Appellant By : Smt. Usha Gaikwad. Dr Respondent By : Shri Dhanesh Bafna. Ar Date Of Hearing 31.08.2021 Date Of Pronouncement 02.09.2021 आदेश / O R D E R Per Pavan Kumar Gadale Jm: The Revenue Has Filed The Appeal Against The Order Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-16, Mumbai, Passed U/S 143(3) & 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961. The Revenue Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal.

For Appellant: Smt. Usha Gaikwad. DRFor Respondent: Shri Dhanesh Bafna. AR
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)

…s whether the CIT was justified in giving a direction in para 10.5 of his order on apportionment of goodwill between the assessee and its affiliates. The assessee relied upon the decision of the Bombay High Court in the case of Herdillia Chemicals reported in 221 ITR 194 and based on this decision submitted that since there is a specific direction on merits by the CIT to the AU, the Tribunal ought to adjudicate this issue. On perusal of the CITs order and applying the decision of the jurisdictional High Court, the assessee is justified in raising this issue before us. The direction of the CIT on this issue is wit…

FEDEX EXPRESS TRANPORTATION AND SUPPLY CHAIN SERVICES (INDIA) P.LTD,MUMBAI vs. PR CIT 9, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 3621/MUM/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai17 Nov 2017AY 2011-12

Bench: D.T. Garasia & Shri Rajesh Kumarassessment Year: 2011-12 Fedex Express Transportation The Principal Commissioner Of & Supply Chain Services Income Tax – 9 Room No.214, 2Nd Floor, (India) Private Limited Boomerang, Unit No.801, Aayakar Bhavan, M. K. Road, Vs. Wing-A, 8Th Floor, Mumbai - 400020 Chandivali Farm Road, Andheri (East) Mumbai - 400072 Pan: Aabcf6516A (Appellant) (Respondent) Present For: Assessee By : Shri Jitendra Jain Revenue By : Shri S. Padmaja (Cit-Dr) Date Of Hearing : 15.09.2017 Date Of Pronouncement : 17.11.2017 O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri Jitendra JainFor Respondent: Shri S. Padmaja (CIT-DR)
Section 119Section 139(5)Section 263

…s whether the CIT was justified in giving a direction in para 10.5 of his order on apportionment of goodwill between the assessee and its affiliates. The assessee relied upon the decision of the Bombay High Court in the case of Herdillia Chemicals reported in 221 ITR 194 and based on this decision submitted that since there is a specific direction on merits by the CIT to the AU, the Tribunal ought to adjudicate this issue. On perusal of the CITs order and applying the decision of the jurisdictional High Court, the assessee is justified in raising this issue before us. The direction of the CIT on this issue is wit…