Kamal Motors v. CIT
131 Taxmann 155High Court2003#3104 most cited
What is Kamal Motors v. CIT authority for?
An assessee must prove not only the identity of a creditor but also their capacity and creditworthiness to discharge the onus of proving the genuineness of a transaction. Merely filing a confirmation letter from one's own books is insufficient.
39
judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2026.
Also referred to as
Kamal Motors v CIT · section 68 · share application money · creditworthiness of creditor · source of source · genuineness of transaction · onus of proof · confirmation letter · cash credits · unexplained income
Also reported as
131 Taxmann.com 328
Sections most often in play
Issues it is cited on
Judgments citing Kamal Motors v. CIT
Showing 1–20 of 39 · Page 1 of 2