Jindal Stainless Ltd. v. ACIT, CC-6

120 ITD 301Income Tax Appellate Tribunal2009#3854 most cited

What is Jindal Stainless Ltd. v. ACIT, CC-6 authority for?

Assessments framed under section 153A are invalid if a valid search warrant under section 132 was not issued in the name of the assessee. Such assessments are void-ab-initio.

30

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,470 Indian tax judgments — from 2016 to 2025.

Also referred to as

Jindal Stainless Ltd. v. ACIT · 120 ITD 301 · section 153A · section 132 · search warrant · invalid assessment · void-ab-initio · PANCHNAMA

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Jindal Stainless Ltd. v. ACIT, CC-6

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle-2, Ludhiana vs. Ab Alcobev Private Limited, Delhi

In the result, appeals of Revenue are dismissed, Cross

ITA 360/CHANDI/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh01 Sept 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Krinwant Sahayआयकर अपील सं./ Ita Nos.356, 357, 358 & 360/Chd/2024 निर्धारण वर्ष / A.Y. : 2016-17, 2017-18, 2019-20 & 2020-21 The Dcit, Central Circle-2, Ludhiana. Vs Ab Alcobev Pvt. Ltd., 154, 1St Floor, Aggarwal Plaza-1, Anandvas Shakurpur, North West, Delhi. अपीलार्थी/Appellant स्थायी लेखा सं./Pan No: Aalca0327J प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent & C.O. Nos.17 To 20/Chd/2025 In

For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Manav Bansal, CIT DR
Section 132Section 153ASection 153CSection 153DSection 249Section 253Section 3Section 5

…ed in [2016] 73 taxmann.com 159 (SC). (Refer page no. 32 of case law index book) CIT Vs Jolly Fantasy World Ltd., reported in [2015] 57 taxmann.com 80 (Gujarat HC) (Refer page no. 33-43 of case law index book) Jindal Stainless Ltd. Vs ACIT, reported in [2009] 120 ITD 301 (Del.)(Refer page no. 44 of case law index book) Thus, in nutshell, no panchnama was drawn and even if it is said that the search has been initiated but without execution of search, the completion of assessment u/s 153A are bad in law and, thus, it suffers from non-curable defects, which we have submitted at page 20 of the order of CIT(A). 1.13 F…

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-2, Ludhiana vs. Ab Alcobev Private Limited, Delhi

In the result, appeals of Revenue are dismissed, Cross

ITA 358/CHANDI/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh01 Sept 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Krinwant Sahayआयकर अपील सं./ Ita Nos.356, 357, 358 & 360/Chd/2024 निर्धारण वर्ष / A.Y. : 2016-17, 2017-18, 2019-20 & 2020-21 The Dcit, Central Circle-2, Ludhiana. Vs Ab Alcobev Pvt. Ltd., 154, 1St Floor, Aggarwal Plaza-1, Anandvas Shakurpur, North West, Delhi. अपीलार्थी/Appellant स्थायी लेखा सं./Pan No: Aalca0327J प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent & C.O. Nos.17 To 20/Chd/2025 In

For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Manav Bansal, CIT DR
Section 132Section 153ASection 153CSection 153DSection 249Section 253Section 3Section 5

…16] 73 taxmann.com 159 (SC). (Refer page no. 32 of case law index book) xi) CIT Vs Jolly Fantasy World Ltd., reported in [2015] 57 taxmann.com 80 (Gujarat HC) (Refer page no. 33-43 of case law index book) xii) Jindal Stainless Ltd. Vs ACIT, reported in [2009] 120 ITD 301 (Del.)(Refer page no. 44 of case law index book) Thus, in nutshell, no panchnama was drawn and even if it is said that the search has been initiated but without execution of search, the completion of assessment u/s 153A are bad in law and, thus, it suffers from non-curable defects, which we have submitted at page 20 of the order of CIT(A). 1.13 F…

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle-2, Ludhiana vs. Ab Alcobev Private Limited, Delhi

In the result, appeals of Revenue are dismissed, Cross

ITA 357/CHANDI/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh01 Sept 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Krinwant Sahayआयकर अपील सं./ Ita Nos.356, 357, 358 & 360/Chd/2024 निर्धारण वर्ष / A.Y. : 2016-17, 2017-18, 2019-20 & 2020-21 The Dcit, Central Circle-2, Ludhiana. Vs Ab Alcobev Pvt. Ltd., 154, 1St Floor, Aggarwal Plaza-1, Anandvas Shakurpur, North West, Delhi. अपीलार्थी/Appellant स्थायी लेखा सं./Pan No: Aalca0327J प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent & C.O. Nos.17 To 20/Chd/2025 In

For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Manav Bansal, CIT DR
Section 132Section 153ASection 153CSection 153DSection 249Section 253Section 3Section 5

…2016] 73 taxmann.com 159 (SC). (Refer page no. 32 of case law index book) x) CIT Vs Jolly Fantasy World Ltd., reported in [2015] 57 taxmann.com 80 (Gujarat HC) (Refer page no. 33-43 of case law index book) xi) Jindal Stainless Ltd. Vs ACIT, reported in [2009] 120 ITD 301 (Del.)(Refer page no. 44 of case law index book) Thus, in nutshell, no panchnama was drawn and even if it is said that the search has been initiated but without execution of search, the completion of assessment u/s 153A are bad in law and, thus, it suffers from non-curable defects, which we have submitted at page 20 of the order of CIT(A). 1.13 F…

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle-2 Ludhiana, Ludhiana vs. Ab Alcobev Private Limited, Delhi

In the result, appeals of Revenue are dismissed, Cross

ITA 356/CHANDI/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh01 Sept 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Krinwant Sahayआयकर अपील सं./ Ita Nos.356, 357, 358 & 360/Chd/2024 निर्धारण वर्ष / A.Y. : 2016-17, 2017-18, 2019-20 & 2020-21 The Dcit, Central Circle-2, Ludhiana. Vs Ab Alcobev Pvt. Ltd., 154, 1St Floor, Aggarwal Plaza-1, Anandvas Shakurpur, North West, Delhi. अपीलार्थी/Appellant प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent स्थायी लेखा सं./Pan No: Aalca0327J & C.O. Nos.17 To 20/Chd/2025 In

For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Manav Bansal, CIT DR
Section 132Section 153ASection 153CSection 153DSection 249Section 253Section 3Section 5

…2016] 73 taxmann.com 159 (SC). (Refer page no. 32 of case law index book) x) CIT Vs Jolly Fantasy World Ltd., reported in [2015] 57 taxmann.com 80 (Gujarat HC) (Refer page no. 33-43 of case law index book) xi) Jindal Stainless Ltd. Vs ACIT, reported in [2009] 120 ITD 301 (Del.)(Refer page no. 44 of case law index book) Thus, in nutshell, no panchnama was drawn and even if it is said that the search has been initiated but without execution of search, the completion of assessment u/s 153A are bad in law and, thus, it suffers from non-curable defects, which we have submitted at page 20 of the order of CIT(A). 1.13 F…

Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-25, New Delhi, Delhi vs. Honey Arora, Delhi

In the result, all the 05 appeals filed by the Revenue stand dismissed

ITA 918/DEL/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi11 Jun 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Hon’Bleita No. 915/Del/2025 (Ay 2012-13) Ita No. 917/Del/2025 (Ay 2014-15) & Acit, Central Circle-25, Vs. Honey Arora, A-101, 4Th Floor, Delhi Room No. 317, 3Rd Floor, Ara Shardapuri Centre, Jhandewalan Ramesh Nagar, Extension, Delhi – 55 Delhi – 15 (Pan: Arnpa8541J) (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By : Sh. Shyam Manohar Singh, Sr. Dr. Respondent By : Sh. Amit Kumar Gupta, Adv. Date Of Hearing 08.05.2025 Date Of Pronouncement 11.06.2025

For Appellant: Sh. Shyam Manohar Singh, Sr. DRFor Respondent: Sh. Amit Kumar Gupta, Adv
Section 131Section 132(1)Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 69A

…ce, the orders framed u/s 153A of the Act in case of, the assessee are non est, invalid, void-ab-initio, illegal and unlawful. Further, the facts of the instant case of the assessee are also similar to the case of Jindal Stainless Ltd. v. ACIT, CC-6 [2009] 7 120 ITD 301 (Delhi) as relied upon by the Ld AR whereby the Cordinate Bench held that the assessments framed on the assessee under section 153A are invalid assessments when there is no warrant of authorization of search u/s 132 of the Act in his own name. Accordingly, following the decision of the coordinate bench only, it is held that the assessments framed…

Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-25, New Delhi, Delhi vs. Honey Arora, Delhi

In the result, all the 05 appeals filed by the Revenue stand dismissed

ITA 917/DEL/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi11 Jun 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Hon’Bleita No. 915/Del/2025 (Ay 2012-13) Ita No. 917/Del/2025 (Ay 2014-15) & Acit, Central Circle-25, Vs. Honey Arora, A-101, 4Th Floor, Delhi Room No. 317, 3Rd Floor, Ara Shardapuri Centre, Jhandewalan Ramesh Nagar, Extension, Delhi – 55 Delhi – 15 (Pan: Arnpa8541J) (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By : Sh. Shyam Manohar Singh, Sr. Dr. Respondent By : Sh. Amit Kumar Gupta, Adv. Date Of Hearing 08.05.2025 Date Of Pronouncement 11.06.2025

For Appellant: Sh. Shyam Manohar Singh, Sr. DRFor Respondent: Sh. Amit Kumar Gupta, Adv
Section 131Section 132(1)Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 69A

…ce, the orders framed u/s 153A of the Act in case of, the assessee are non est, invalid, void-ab-initio, illegal and unlawful. Further, the facts of the instant case of the assessee are also similar to the case of Jindal Stainless Ltd. v. ACIT, CC-6 [2009] 7 120 ITD 301 (Delhi) as relied upon by the Ld AR whereby the Cordinate Bench held that the assessments framed on the assessee under section 153A are invalid assessments when there is no warrant of authorization of search u/s 132 of the Act in his own name. Accordingly, following the decision of the coordinate bench only, it is held that the assessments framed…

Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-25, New Delhi, Delhi vs. Honey Arora, Delhi

In the result, all the 05 appeals filed by the Revenue stand dismissed

ITA 916/DEL/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi11 Jun 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Hon’Bleita No. 915/Del/2025 (Ay 2012-13) Ita No. 917/Del/2025 (Ay 2014-15) & Acit, Central Circle-25, Vs. Honey Arora, A-101, 4Th Floor, Delhi Room No. 317, 3Rd Floor, Ara Shardapuri Centre, Jhandewalan Ramesh Nagar, Extension, Delhi – 55 Delhi – 15 (Pan: Arnpa8541J) (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By : Sh. Shyam Manohar Singh, Sr. Dr. Respondent By : Sh. Amit Kumar Gupta, Adv. Date Of Hearing 08.05.2025 Date Of Pronouncement 11.06.2025

For Appellant: Sh. Shyam Manohar Singh, Sr. DRFor Respondent: Sh. Amit Kumar Gupta, Adv
Section 131Section 132(1)Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 69A

…ce, the orders framed u/s 153A of the Act in case of, the assessee are non est, invalid, void-ab-initio, illegal and unlawful. Further, the facts of the instant case of the assessee are also similar to the case of Jindal Stainless Ltd. v. ACIT, CC-6 [2009] 7 120 ITD 301 (Delhi) as relied upon by the Ld AR whereby the Cordinate Bench held that the assessments framed on the assessee under section 153A are invalid assessments when there is no warrant of authorization of search u/s 132 of the Act in his own name. Accordingly, following the decision of the coordinate bench only, it is held that the assessments framed…

Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-25, New Delhi, Delhi vs. Honey Arora, Delhi

In the result, all the 05 appeals filed by the Revenue stand dismissed

ITA 915/DEL/2025[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi11 Jun 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Hon’Bleita No. 915/Del/2025 (Ay 2012-13) Ita No. 917/Del/2025 (Ay 2014-15) & Acit, Central Circle-25, Vs. Honey Arora, A-101, 4Th Floor, Delhi Room No. 317, 3Rd Floor, Ara Shardapuri Centre, Jhandewalan Ramesh Nagar, Extension, Delhi – 55 Delhi – 15 (Pan: Arnpa8541J) (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By : Sh. Shyam Manohar Singh, Sr. Dr. Respondent By : Sh. Amit Kumar Gupta, Adv. Date Of Hearing 08.05.2025 Date Of Pronouncement 11.06.2025

For Appellant: Sh. Shyam Manohar Singh, Sr. DRFor Respondent: Sh. Amit Kumar Gupta, Adv
Section 131Section 132(1)Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 69A

…ce, the orders framed u/s 153A of the Act in case of, the assessee are non est, invalid, void-ab-initio, illegal and unlawful. Further, the facts of the instant case of the assessee are also similar to the case of Jindal Stainless Ltd. v. ACIT, CC-6 [2009] 7 120 ITD 301 (Delhi) as relied upon by the Ld AR whereby the Cordinate Bench held that the assessments framed on the assessee under section 153A are invalid assessments when there is no warrant of authorization of search u/s 132 of the Act in his own name. Accordingly, following the decision of the coordinate bench only, it is held that the assessments framed…