JCIT SPL. RANGE-12, NEW DELHI vs. ARIHANTA INDUSTRIES, DELHI
In the result, both the appeals of the Revenue are allowed
ITA 963/DEL/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi17 Jul 2023AY 2015-16
Bench: Sh. Saktijit Deydr. B. R. R. Kumar
For Appellant: Sh. Sachit Jolly, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. P. Praveen Sidharth, CIT DR
Section 131Section 68Section 801CSection 80I
…ed inaccurate particulars of his income, therefore, penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income tax Act, 1961 are being initiated separately. Strong reliance is placed on the judgment of the Gujrat High Court in the case of Rushil Industries Ltd.( (2001) 251 ITR 608 (Guj), In this case, the assessing officer had found that the assessee was engaged in bogus sales two parties on the basis of enquiry and evidence on record and accordingly additions u/s 68 was made by the AO. The purchaser to establish the genuineness of the sales made by him. The Hon'ble Gujrat High Court after considering all the evidences and…