Impsat Pvt. Ltd. v. ITO

91 ITD 354Income Tax Appellate Tribunal2004#7697 most cited
15

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2021.

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Impsat Pvt. Ltd. v. ITO

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. NDC TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDIA PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

ITA 3011/DEL/2015[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi16 Oct 2018AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Kuldip Singhassessment Year: 2004-05 Dcit, Vs. Ndc Telecommunications Circle-18(1), India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi. 4, Central Lane, Bengali Market, New Delhi. Pan: Aaacn2219C (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Salil Kapoor & Ms Ananya Kapoor, Advocates Revenue By : Shri B.P. Singh, Sr.Dr Date Of Hearing : 15.10.2018 Date Of Pronouncement: 16.10.2018 Order Per R.K. Panda, Am: This Appeal By The Revenue Is Directed Against The Order Dated 25Th February, 2015 Of The Cit(A)-6,Delhi Relating To Assessment Year 2004-05. 2. The Only Effective Ground Raised By The Revenue Reads As Under:- “1. Whether On The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case & In Law, The Ld.Cit(A) Was Justified In Holding That Reassessment Cannot Be Made In The Case Of A Dissolved Company Even For The Year In Which The Company Was Existing.” 3. The Facts Of The Case In Brief Are That The Assessee Is A Company & Filed Its Return Of Income On 31St October, 2004 Declaring Loss Of Rs.11,08,72,956/-. The Assessing Officer Completed Assessment U/S 143(3) On 29Th September, 2006 Determining The Loss At Rs.8,78,79,819/-. Thereafter, Notice U/S 148 Dated 28Th March, 2011 Was Issued To The Assessee. The Assessee, In Response To The Statutory Notices, Appeared Before The Assessing Officer & Filed Various Details As Called For. The Assessing Officer Completed The Assessment Determining The Loss At Rs.7,27,32,900/-.

For Appellant: Shri Salil Kapoor &For Respondent: Shri B.P. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

…d Vs. ACIT (ITA No. 4016/Del/05) (ITAT Delhi) the Hon’ble Delhi Tribunal has held that no order can be passed on a non existing company. While passing the said order, the Hon’ble Tribunal referred to its earlier decision in the case of Impsat (P) Ltd Vs. ITO (91 ITD 354) (Del) wherein it was held that “existence of the person sought to be taxed at the point of making the assessment is a condition for the validity of the assessment”. 4.5 In Modi Corp Ltd Vs. JCIT (ITA No. 211/Del/2001) (ITAT Delhi) The Hon’ble Tribunal has observed as under: “In view of the legal position as laid down in the aforesaid decisions, i…

GE MEDICAL SYSTEMS (INDIA) PVT. LTD.,,BANGALORE vs. DCIT, BANGALORE

ITA 328/BANG/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore04 Nov 2015AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Vijaypal Rao & Shri Jason P. Boazi.T.(T.P.) A. No.328/Bang/2015 (Assessment Year : 2010-11) M/S. Ge Medical Systems (India) Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, (Since Merged With Wipro Ge Healthcare Circle 7(1)(2), Bangalore. Pvt. Ltd.) Plot Nos.3, 3A & 4, Kadugodi Indl. Area, Bangalore-560 067 Pan Aaacg 7655G Appellant Respondent. I.T.(T.P.) A. No.224/Bang/2015 (Assessment Year : 2010-11) (By Revenue) Assessee By : Shri K.R. Pradeep, C.A. Revenue By : Shri G.R. Reddy, Cit-I (D.R.) Date Of Hearing : 9.9.2015. Date Of Pronouncement : 4.11.2015. O R D E R Per Shri Jason P. Boaz, A.M. : These Are Cross Appeals By Revenue & The Assessee, Preferred Against The Final Order Of Assessment Dt.30.12.2014 Passed Under Section 143(3) Rws 144C(13) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (In Short 'The Act') In Pursuance To The Directions Dt.28.11.2014 Issued By The Dispute Resolution Panel (‘Drp’) Under Section 144C(5) Of The Act. 2. The Facts Of The Case, Briefly, Are As Under :-

For Appellant: Shri K.R. Pradeep, C.AFor Respondent: Shri G.R. Reddy, CIT-I (D.R.)
Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 144C(5)Section 154Section 92C

…id order of assessment passed on a non-existent entity would be a nullity and invalid in the eyes of law. In support of this contention, the learned Authorised Representative placed reliance on the following judicial pronouncements – i) Impsat (P) Ltd. V ITO (91 ITD 354) (Del) ii) Hewlett Packard India Pvt. Ltd. in ITA No.4016/Del/2005 dt.28.4.2006 (Delhi- ITAT), wherein at paras 5, 6 and 12, it has been held as under :- “5. Since the registered office of H.P. Sales was at Bangalore a petition u/s.391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 was presented by the transferee company for sanction of the scheme before the…