PALLAVI PANDEY,MUMBAI vs. DCIT (CC) 2(3), MUMBAI
In the result the appeals hereinabove are partly allowed
ITA 7124/MUM/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai23 Dec 2020AY 2013-14
Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Amarjit Singhassessment Year: 2013-14
For Appellant: Shri Anil Shathe, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Manpreet Singh Duggal, D.R
Section 10(38)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 68Section 69C
…nly providing 7 ITA No.7124/M/2019 & ITA No.7581/M/2019 Mrs. Pallavi Pandey & Shri Rajendra Chaturvedi entry was not disclosed by assessee hence what was submitted was not true. Therefore, failure on the part of assessee. (iii) Yash Raj Films Pvt Ltd vs ACIT 15 Taxmann.com 275 Bombay High Court in this case, it was on the basis of survey action that several new facts came to light and several discrepancies in the accounts of assessee were discovered which indicated escapement of income thus reopening was held valid. Hence, ground no. 1 and its sub-parts (a), (b) (c) and (d) are dismissed.” 6. After hearing both…