(i) Smt.Dayawanti v. CIT

47 Taxmann.com 375High Court2014#5074 most cited

What is (i) Smt.Dayawanti v. CIT authority for?

Notings on a scribbling pad are not inherently incriminatory and cannot be the sole basis for an addition without reference by the Assessing Officer or penalty order.

23

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2019 to 2023.

Also referred to as

Smt.Dayawanti v. CIT · 47 Taxmann.com 375 · scribbling pad · unrecorded items of income · incriminatory nature · addition · penalty order · Assessing Officer

Judgments citing (i) Smt.Dayawanti v. CIT

SARITHA SHIVAYYAGARI ,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-11(3) , HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 98/HYD/2020[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad17 Oct 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Laliet Kumarassessment Year: 2009-10 Smt. Saritha Shivayyagari Vs. Income Tax Officer Hyderabad. Ward 11(3) Pan:Bkqps0479M Hyderabad (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Shri P. Murali Mohan, Ca Revenue By: Shri Kumar Aditya, Dr Date Of Hearing: 03/10/2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 17/10/2022 O R D E R Per Laliet Kumar, J.M This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Dated 18.10.2019 Passed By The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) – 1, Hyderabad Relating To A.Y.2009-10. 2. Although A Number Of Grounds Have Been Raised By The Assessee, However, These All Relate To The Order Of The Learned Cit (A) In Sustaining The Disallowance Of Rs.63,75,185/- Made By The Assessing Officer U/S 143(3) R.W.S. 147 Of The I.T. Act, 1961. Ita 98/Hyd/2020

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali Mohan, CAFor Respondent: Shri Kumar Aditya, DR
Section 131Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 148

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, हैदराबाद पीठ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Hyderabad ‘ B ‘ Bench, Hyderabad Before Shri R.K. Panda, Accountant Member AND Shri Laliet Kumar, Judicial Member Assessment Year: 2009-10 Smt. Saritha Shivayyagari Vs. Income Tax Officer Hyderabad. Ward 11(3) PAN:BKQPS0479M Hyderabad (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by: Shri P. Murali Mohan, CA Revenue by: Shri Kumar Aditya, DR Date of hearing: 03/10/2022 Date of pronouncement: 17/10/2022 O R D E R Per Laliet Kumar, J.M This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 18.10.2019 passed by the learned Commissioner of Inc…

FMS DENTAL HOSPITALS PRIVATE LIMITED, HYDERABAD,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-17(1), HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 226/HYD/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad30 Jun 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Before Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Laliet Kumarassessment Year: 2012-13 M/S. Fms Dental Hospitals Vs. The Asst.Commissioner Of Private Limited, Income Tax, Koti, Hyderabad. Circle – 17(1), Hyderabad. Pan : Aaacf3014G (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Sri B. Statyanarayana Murthy, Ca Revenue By: Sri K.P.R.R. Murthy Date Of Hearing: 29.06.2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 30.06.2022 O R D E R Per Laliet Kumar, J.M. This Appeal Is Filed By The Assessee Feeling Aggrieved By The Order Of Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) – 5, Hyderabad Dt.30.11.2016 For The Assessment Year 2012-13 On The Following Grounds :

For Appellant: Sri B. Statyanarayana Murthy, CAFor Respondent: Sri K.P.R.R. Murthy
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 292C

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Hyderabad ‘ A ‘ Bench, Hyderabad Before Before Shri Rama Kanta Panda, Accountant Member AND Shri Laliet Kumar, Judicial Member Assessment Year: 2012-13 M/s. FMS Dental Hospitals Vs. The Asst.Commissioner of Private Limited, Income Tax, Koti, Hyderabad. Circle – 17(1), Hyderabad. PAN : AAACF3014G (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by: Sri B. Statyanarayana Murthy, CA Revenue by: Sri K.P.R.R. Murthy Date of hearing: 29.06.2022 Date of pronouncement: 30.06.2022 O R D E R Per Laliet Kumar, J.M. This appeal is filed by the assessee feeling aggrieved by the order of learned Commiss…

VIBHA AGROTECH LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-17(2), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 179/HYD/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad28 Jun 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Before Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Laliet Kumarassessment Year: 2013-14 Vibha Agrotech Limited, Vs. The Dy.Commissioner Of Hyderabad. Income Tax, Circle – 17(2), Pan : Aaacv8157A Hyderabad. (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Sri Ca P. Murali Mohan Rao Revenue By: Dr. Rajendra Kumar, Cit Date Of Hearing: 23.06.2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 28.06.2022 O R D E R Per Laliet Kumar, J.M. This Appeal Is Filed By The Assessee Feeling Aggrieved By The Order Of Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) – 5, Hyderabad Dt.21.07.2017 For The Assessment Year 2013-14 On The Following Grounds :

For Appellant: Sri CA P. Murali Mohan RaoFor Respondent: Dr. Rajendra Kumar, CIT
Section 10(1)Section 14ASection 35Section 37(1)Section 44A

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Hyderabad ‘ A ‘ Bench, Hyderabad Before Before Shri Rama Kanta Panda, Accountant Member AND Shri Laliet Kumar, Judicial Member Assessment Year: 2013-14 Vibha Agrotech Limited, Vs. The Dy.Commissioner of Hyderabad. Income Tax, Circle – 17(2), PAN : AAACV8157A Hyderabad. (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by: Sri CA P. Murali Mohan Rao Revenue by: Dr. Rajendra Kumar, CIT Date of hearing: 23.06.2022 Date of pronouncement: 28.06.2022 O R D E R Per Laliet Kumar, J.M. This appeal is filed by the assessee feeling aggrieved by the order of learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)…

Showing 120 of 23 · Page 1 of 2