(i) CIT v. Shri Arbuda Mills Ltd.

98 Taxmann 457Supreme Court of India1998#13096 most cited
8

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2024.

Judgments citing (i) CIT v. Shri Arbuda Mills Ltd.

AUTHORGEN TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED,PUNJAB vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CHANDIGARH-1, CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal is allowed

ITA 541/CHANDI/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh23 Sept 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Krinwant Sahay & Shri Paresh M. Joshiआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 541/Chd/2024 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2017-18 Authrogen Technologies Vs. The Pcit, बनाम Chandigarh-1, Private Limited, Chandigarh C-203, 8Th Floor, World Tech Power, Industrial Area, Phase Viii, Mohali "थायी लेखा सं./Pan No: Aadca0494Q अपीलाथ"/ Appellant ""यथ"/ Repsondent (Physical Hearing ) "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee By : Shri K M Gupta, Advocate & Shri Jaskaran Singh, Advocate राज"व क" ओर से/ Revenue By : Shri Rohit Sharma, Cit Dr

For Appellant: Shri K M Gupta, Advocate &For Respondent: Shri Rohit Sharma, CIT DR
Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 263(1)Section 263(2)Section 68

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण,च"डीगढ़ "यायपीठ, च"डीगढ़ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CHANDIGARH BENCH, ‘A’, CHANDIGARH BEFORE SHRI KRINWANT SAHAY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & SHRI PARESH M. JOSHI, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 541/CHD/2024 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2017-18 Authrogen Technologies Vs. The PCIT, बनाम Chandigarh-1, Private Limited, Chandigarh C-203, 8th Floor, World Tech Power, Industrial Area, Phase VIII, Mohali "थायी लेखा सं./PAN No: AADCA0494Q अपीलाथ"/ APPELLANT ""यथ"/ REPSONDENT (PHYSICAL HEARING ) "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee by : Shri K M Gupta, Advocate & Shri Jaskaran Singh, Advocate राज"व…

(i) CIT v. Shri Arbuda Mills Ltd. (98 Taxmann 457) — Cited in 8 Judgments | BharatTax