(i) CIT v. Nikunj Eximp Enterprises Pvt. Ltd.

77 Taxmann.com 275Income Tax Appellate Tribunal2017#9882 most cited

What is (i) CIT v. Nikunj Eximp Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. authority for?

The recording of purchase transactions and subsequent export of goods in the books of accounts can prove the genuineness and veracity of such purchase transactions.

11

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2025.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Nikunj Eximp Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. · section 133(6) · genuineness of purchase · veracity of purchase · books of accounts · export of goods · ITAT · Mumbai · company · business

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing (i) CIT v. Nikunj Eximp Enterprises Pvt. Ltd.

Bhawani Singh Rathore, Mumbai vs. Asst CIT Cir 24(1), Mumbai

Appeal stands dismissed

ITA 7365/MUM/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai09 Feb 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey, Jm & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.7365/Mum/2016 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2009-10) Bhawani Singh Rathore Assistant Commissioner Of बनाम/ Income Tax Circle 24(1) 1009/B-Wing 6Th Floor, Piramal Chambers, Aditya Vardhan,Chandiwali Vs. Andheri(E), Mumbai-400 059 Lalbaug Mumbai-400 012 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No.Adypr-3619-R (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""थ" / Respondent) : Revenue By : V. Jenardhanan, Ld.Dr Assessee By : Bhupendra Shah,Ld.Ar सुनवाई की तारीख / : 06/02/2018 Date Of Hearing घोषणा की तारीख / : 09 /02/2018 Date Of Pronouncement

For Appellant: Bhupendra Shah,Ld.ARFor Respondent: V. Jenardhanan, Ld.DR
Section 133(6)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 69C

…the assessee in this year was higher than the immediately preceding year and the assessee paid VAT twice and further the additions could not be made u/s 69C. Reliance has been placed in the order of this Tribunal rendered by SMC Bench in ITO Vs. Karsan Nandu [77 Taxmann.com 275 30/11/2016]. Per contra, Ld. Departmental Representative [DR] stressed the point that the assessee failed to produce even single supplier to confirm the transactions and the said suppliers were non-existent and therefore, the stand of Ld. CIT(A) was 4 Bhawani Singh Rathore Assessment Year 2009-10 quite justified. Our attention is further d…

(i) CIT v. Nikunj Eximp Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. (77 Taxmann.com 275) — Cited in 11 Judgments | BharatTax