Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages P. Ltd. v. CIT

296 ITR 41High Court2008#6002 most cited
20

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2016 to 2025.

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages P. Ltd. v. CIT

SECRETARY, PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, UTTAR PRADESH,ALLAHABAD vs. IT OFFICER, T.D.S., ALLAHABAD

In the result appeal filed by assessee in ITA no

ITA 11/ALLD/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad26 Mar 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri.Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kocharassessment Year: 2013-14 Assessment Year: 2014-15 The Ito (Tds), V. Public Service Commission 38, M.G. Marg, Civil Lines, (Lok Sewa Aayog), Allahabad,Up Uttar Pradesh, Stanley Road, Allahabad,Up Tan: Aldl00365B (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year: 2013-14 Assessment Year: 2014-15 The Secretary, V. The Income Tax Officer (Tds), Public Service Commission Aaykar Bhawan, (Lok Sewa Aayog), 38, M.G. Marg, Uttar Pradesh, Allahabad,Up Stanley Road Allahabad,Up Tan: Aldl00365B (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri A.K. Singh, Sr. DRFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Kumar, Adv
Section 194CSection 194JSection 201

…ees have failed to pay tax on their income. 11.Without Prejudice, the learned Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals) ought to have directed the Assessing Officer to follow the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages P Ltd. Vs CIT 211 CTR 545. ITA Nos. 329-330/ALLD/2017 & 10-11/ALLD/2018 Assessment Years: 2013-14 & 2014-15 Public Service Commission That the Appellant craves leave to add, alter, modify, vary, delete any ground of appeal before or at the time of hearing.” 4. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a State Organization being an autonomous body which came in…

SECRETARY, PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, UTTAR PRADESH,ALLAHABAD vs. IT OFFICER, T.D.S., ALLAHABAD

In the result appeal filed by assessee in ITA no

ITA 10/ALLD/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad26 Mar 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri.Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kocharassessment Year: 2013-14 Assessment Year: 2014-15 The Ito (Tds), V. Public Service Commission 38, M.G. Marg, Civil Lines, (Lok Sewa Aayog), Allahabad,Up Uttar Pradesh, Stanley Road, Allahabad,Up Tan: Aldl00365B (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year: 2013-14 Assessment Year: 2014-15 The Secretary, V. The Income Tax Officer (Tds), Public Service Commission Aaykar Bhawan, (Lok Sewa Aayog), 38, M.G. Marg, Uttar Pradesh, Allahabad,Up Stanley Road Allahabad,Up Tan: Aldl00365B (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri A.K. Singh, Sr. DRFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Kumar, Adv
Section 194CSection 194JSection 201

…ees have failed to pay tax on their income. 11.Without Prejudice, the learned Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals) ought to have directed the Assessing Officer to follow the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages P Ltd. Vs CIT 211 CTR 545. ITA Nos. 329-330/ALLD/2017 & 10-11/ALLD/2018 Assessment Years: 2013-14 & 2014-15 Public Service Commission That the Appellant craves leave to add, alter, modify, vary, delete any ground of appeal before or at the time of hearing.” 4. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a State Organization being an autonomous body which came in…

RAMESH ANAND,INDORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-4(1), INDORE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 64/IND/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Indore27 Nov 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Boradassessment Year: 2012-13 Ramesh Anand Ito, 4(1), C/O G.J. Shah & Co., 416, बनाम/ Manas Bhawan Main, 11, Indore Vs. Rnt Marg, Indore (Appellant) (Revenue) Pan: Aeapa1661F Appellant By Shri Pankaj Shah, Ca Respondent By Shri K.C. Selvamni Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing: 20.11.2018 Date Of Pronouncement: 27.11.2018 आदेश / O R D E R Per Manish Borad, A.M: This Appeal Of Assessee Pertaining To A.Y. 2012-13 Is Directed Against The Order Of Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals)-Ii, Indore, (In Short ‘Cit(A)’), Dated 16.11.2017 Which Is Arising Out Of The Order U/S 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act 1961(Hereinafter Called As The ‘Act’) Framed On Ramesh Anand

Section 139Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 40

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, इ"दौर "यायपीठ, इ"दौर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL INDORE BENCH, INDORE BEFORE SHRI KUL BHARAT, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI MANISH BORAD, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year: 2012-13 Ramesh Anand ITO, 4(1), C/o G.J. Shah & Co., 416, बनाम/ Manas Bhawan Main, 11, Indore Vs. RNT Marg, Indore (Appellant) (Revenue) PAN: AEAPA1661F Appellant by Shri Pankaj Shah, CA Respondent by Shri K.C. Selvamni Sr. DR Date of Hearing: 20.11.2018 Date of Pronouncement: 27.11.2018 आदेश / O R D E R PER MANISH BORAD, A.M: This appeal of Assessee pertaining to A.Y. 2012-13 is directed against the order of Ld. Co…

GUJRAT PIPAVAV PORT LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT TDS 1(1), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 7056/MUM/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai24 Aug 2016AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao & Shri C.N. Prasadआयकर अपील सं /I.Ta Nos.7056 & 7057/Mum/2014 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2010-11 & 1011-12 M/S. Gujarat Pipavav Port The Dcit-Tds-1(1), बनाम/ Ltd., Smt. K.G. Mittal Ayurvedic Vs. 301 Trade Centre, Hospital Bldg., Bandra-Kurla Complex, Charni Road, Bandra (E), Mumbai Mumbai-400 051 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. Aaacg 6975B .. (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ" ओर से/ Appellant By: Shri Niraj Seth ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By: Shri Airiju Jaikaran

For Appellant: Shri Niraj SethFor Respondent: Shri Airiju Jaikaran
Section 194Section 194CSection 194JSection 201(1)

…(1) for short deduction of TDS. However, since the recipient i.e. ULPL has offered the receipts from assessee as its income, the Assessing Officer following the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Hindustan Coca Cola Beverage (P) Ltd. Vs CIT (211 CTR 545) held that no further tax can be recovered from the assessee company but he worked out the interest liable to be charged u/s. 201(1A) at Rs. 13,28,381/- and Rs. 19,62,967/- for the Assessment Years 2010-11 and 2011-12 respectively. The Ld. CIT(A) sustained the view of the Assessing Officer that the services to deduct TDS u/s. 194J of the Act. How…