Hindustan Coca Beverages (P) Ltd. v. CIT

288 ITR 379High Court2007#1929 most cited

What is Hindustan Coca Beverages (P) Ltd. v. CIT authority for?

If a deductee has paid tax directly, the deductor's liability for non-deduction under Section 201(1) abates, and the deductor cannot be treated as an assessee-in-default. Interest under Section 201(1A) can only be charged from the date tax was deductible until the date it was actually paid by the deductee.

59

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2009 to 2023.

Also referred to as

Hindustan Coca Beverages (P) Ltd. · 288 ITR 379 · Section 201(1) · assessee in default · deductee payment of tax · abatement of deductor liability · interest under Section 201(1A) · period of interest levy · non-deduction of tax · Section 191 · TDS liability · CIT vs Adidas India Marketing

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Hindustan Coca Beverages (P) Ltd. v. CIT

M/S SOUL SPACE PROJECTS LTD.,,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT (TDS), NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1084/DEL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi23 Dec 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri C.M. Gargassessment Year: 2012-13 Soul Space Projects Ltd., Vs. Dcit (Tds), No.409, 4Th Floor, Dlf Tower-A, Circle-51 (1), Jasola, New Delhi. New Delhi. Pan: Aajcs7736F (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Rohit Jain & Shri Deepesh Garg, Advocates; & Shri Shaurya Jain, Ca Revenue By : Shri Abhishek Kumar, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 01.12.2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 23.12.2022 Order Per C.M. Garg, Jm: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Dated 28.12.2016 Of The Cit(A)-41, New Delhi, Relating To Assessment Year 2012-13. 2. The Grounds Of Appeal Raised By The Assessee Read As Under:- “1. That On Facts & Circumstances Of The Case, The Ld. Cit(A) Has Erred In Holding The Assessee In Default U/S 201(1) Of The Act In Respect Of Tds Liability Of Rs.2,01,30,477/-. 2. That On Facts & Circumstances Of The Case, The Ld. Cit(A) Has Erred In Holding That The Appellant Is Liable To Pay Interest Of Rs.48,31,315/- U/S 201(1A) Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 On The Aforesaid Tds Liability Of Rs.2,01,30,477/-. 3. The Appellant Reserves Their Right Without Prejudice To Add, Delete, Alter Modify Or Otherwise Present Any Grounds Of Appeal Either Before Or At The Time Of Hearing.”

For Appellant: Shri Rohit Jain &For Respondent: Shri Abhishek Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 191Section 194Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)

…ein it was held that since the payee had filed return and offered the sum received from the assessee to tax, impugned disallowance made under section 40(a)(ia) of the Act deserves to be deleted. Further, in the case of CIT vs. Adidas India Marketing (P) Ltd., 288 ITR 379 (Del), the Hon’ble jurisdictional High Court held that the interest u/s 201(1A) of the Act has to be charged from the date on which such tax was deductible to the date on which such tax is actually paid by the deductee and, no interest beyond the date of actual payment of tax can be claimed by the Department. In view of the above, we have no hesi…

Showing 120 of 59 · Page 1 of 3

Hindustan Coca Beverages (P) Ltd. v. CIT (288 ITR 379) — Cited in 59 Judgments | BharatTax