Himachal Pradesh State Forest Corporation Ltd. v. DCIT

231 ITR 556High Court1998#23929 most cited
3

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2023.

Judgments citing Himachal Pradesh State Forest Corporation Ltd. v. DCIT

FEDEX EXPRESS TRANPORTATION AND SUPPLY CHAIN SERVICES (INDIA) P.LTD,MUMBAI vs. PR CIT 9, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 3621/MUM/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai17 Nov 2017AY 2011-12

Bench: D.T. Garasia & Shri Rajesh Kumarassessment Year: 2011-12 Fedex Express Transportation The Principal Commissioner Of & Supply Chain Services Income Tax – 9 Room No.214, 2Nd Floor, (India) Private Limited Boomerang, Unit No.801, Aayakar Bhavan, M. K. Road, Vs. Wing-A, 8Th Floor, Mumbai - 400020 Chandivali Farm Road, Andheri (East) Mumbai - 400072 Pan: Aabcf6516A (Appellant) (Respondent) Present For: Assessee By : Shri Jitendra Jain Revenue By : Shri S. Padmaja (Cit-Dr) Date Of Hearing : 15.09.2017 Date Of Pronouncement : 17.11.2017 O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri Jitendra JainFor Respondent: Shri S. Padmaja (CIT-DR)
Section 119Section 139(5)Section 263

…revised return declaring loss of Rs.62,71,22,057/-. Therefore, the AO must make the enquiry. Therefore, the Ld. A.R. relied upon the decision of Hon’ble Himachal Pradesh High Court in the case of Himachal Pradesh State Forest Corporation Ltd. vs. DCIT [1998] 231 ITR 556 (HP) and in the case of Sunanda Ram Deka vs. CIT [1994] 210 ITR 988 (Gau). In rejoinder, the Ld. A.R. submitted that the present case is governed by provisions of e-filing which was not in the case of the decision cited by Ld. D.R. One of the reasons for revising the return was a claim of depreciation on goodwill based on the decision of Hon’ble…

Himachal Pradesh State Forest Corporation Ltd. v. DCIT (231 ITR 556) — Cited in 3 Judgments | BharatTax