General Traders v. State of A.P

4 SCC 353Reported decision1983#1009 most cited

What is General Traders v. State of A.P authority for?

The Supreme Court clarified that actual quid pro quo is not an essential element for a fee. It distinguished a tax, levied as a common burden, from a fee, which is for payment of a specific benefit or privilege, even when regulation in the public interest is a primary motive.

107

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2011 to 2021.

Also referred to as

Sreenivasa General Traders v. State of A.P · General Traders · 4 SCC 353 · AIR 1983 SC 1246 · distinction between tax and fee · quid pro quo for fee · essential elements of fee · nature of tax · nature of fee · levy

Judgments citing General Traders v. State of A.P

Showing 120 of 107 · Page 1 of 6

General Traders v. State of A.P (4 SCC 353) — Cited in 107 Judgments | BharatTax