Garg v. PCIT

113 Taxmann.com 93Supreme Court of India2020#9307 most cited

What is Garg v. PCIT authority for?

The assessee bears the burden of proving the source of cash deposited in their bank account. Failure to discharge this burden allows the revenue to treat the deposit as unexplained income under Section 69A.

11

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,005 Indian tax judgments — from 2024 to 2025.

Also referred to as

Garg v. PCIT · Section 69A · unexplained money · cash deposit · burden of proof · assessee · unexplained income · Section 115BBE · Section 68 · addition u/s 69A

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Garg v. PCIT

Vinita Jagdesh Aswani, Pune vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-8(1), Pune

ITA 37/PUN/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Pune01 Oct 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri G. D. Padmahshali & Hon’Ble Shri Vinay Bhamoreassessment Year : 2017-18 Vinita Jagdesh Aswani C-Block, 1/21, Opp. Gurudwara, Pimpri, Pune-411017. Pan: Azrpa6822E. . . . . . . . Appellant V/S The Income Tax Officer, Ward-8(1), Pune. . . . . . . . Respondent Appearances Assessee By : Ms Vibha Gulabani [‘Ld. Ar’] Revenue By : Mr Arvind Desai [‘Ld. Dr’] Date Of Conclusive Hearing : 25/09/2024 Date Of Pronouncement : 01/10/2024 Order Per G. D. Padmahshali, Am; This Appeal Of The Assessee Challenges The Din & Order No. Itba/Nfac/S/250/2023-24/1057730966(1) Dt. 06/11/2023 Passed U/S 250 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 [‘The Act’ Hereinafter] By The National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [‘Nfac’ Hereinafter] Which In Turn Arisen Out Of Order Of Assessment Dt. 23/12/2019 Passed U/S 144 Of The Act By The Income Tax Officer, Ward-8(1), Pune[‘Ao’ Hereinafter] For Assessment Year 2017-18 [‘Ay’ Hereinafter];

For Appellant: Ms Vibha Gulabani [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Mr Arvind Desai [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 115BSection 142(1)Section 144Section 145(3)Section 250Section 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ‘B’ BENCH PUNE BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI G. D. PADMAHSHALI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND HON’BLE SHRI VINAY BHAMORE, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year : 2017-18 Vinita Jagdesh Aswani C-Block, 1/21, Opp. Gurudwara, Pimpri, Pune-411017. PAN: AZRPA6822E. . . . . . . . Appellant V/s The Income Tax Officer, Ward-8(1), Pune. . . . . . . . Respondent Appearances Assessee by : Ms Vibha Gulabani [‘Ld. AR’] Revenue by : Mr Arvind Desai [‘Ld. DR’] Date of conclusive Hearing : 25/09/2024 Date of Pronouncement : 01/10/2024 ORDER PER G. D. PADMAHSHALI, AM; This appeal of the assessee challenges the DIN…

Ashok Ra vs. Aheb Tambe, Nashikvs.ITO, Ward 3(1), Nashik

ITA 999/PUN/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Pune01 Aug 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri G. D. Padmahshali & Shri Vinay Bhamoreassessment Year : 2017-18 Ashok Ravsaheb Tambe 1630, Mhb Colony, Nr Kamgar Nagar, Kalyan Bhavan, Satpur Colony, Nashik-422007 Pan: Aeypt7687J. . . . . . . . Appellant V/S The Income Tax Officer, Ward-3(1), Nashik. . . . . . . . Respondent Appearances Assessee By : None For The Assessee Revenue By : Mr Umesh Phade [‘Ld. Dr’] Date Of Conclusive Hearing : 29/07/2024 Date Of Pronouncement : 01/08/2024 Order Per G. D. Padmahshali, Am; In This Appeal Assessee Challenges Din & Order No. Itba/Apls/S/250/2023- 24/1062404804(1) Dt. 11/03/2024 Passed U/S 250 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 [‘The Act’ Hereinafter] By The Addl./Jt Commissioner Of Income Tax Appeals-3, Bengaluru [‘Cit(A)’ Hereinafter] Which In Turn Arisen Out Of Order Of Assessment Passed U/S 143(3) Of The Act By The Income Tax Officer, Ward-3(1), Nashik [‘Ao’ Hereinafter] For Assessment Year 2017-18 [‘Ay’ Hereinafter];

For Appellant: None for the AssesseeFor Respondent: Mr Umesh Phade [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 115BSection 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 69A

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ‘SMC’ BENCH PUNE BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI G. D. PADMAHSHALI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI VINAY BHAMORE, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year : 2017-18 Ashok Ravsaheb Tambe 1630, MHB Colony, Nr Kamgar Nagar, Kalyan Bhavan, Satpur Colony, Nashik-422007 PAN: AEYPT7687J. . . . . . . . Appellant V/s The Income Tax Officer, Ward-3(1), Nashik. . . . . . . . Respondent Appearances Assessee by : None for the Assessee Revenue by : Mr Umesh Phade [‘Ld. DR’] Date of conclusive Hearing : 29/07/2024 Date of Pronouncement : 01/08/2024 ORDER PER G. D. PADMAHSHALI, AM; In this appeal assessee challen…

Dilip Rangnath Pagare, Pune vs. ITO, Ward 1(2), Aurangabad

ITA 972/PUN/2024[2012-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Jul 2024AY 2012-12

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri G. D. Padmahshali & Shri Vinay Bhamoreassessment Year : 2012-13 Dilip Rangnath Pagare Plot No. 23, Gut No. 105, Pwd Housing Society, Aurangaba-431001. Pan: Bjcpp2914G. . . . . . . . Appellant V/S The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(12), Aurangabad. . . . . . . . Respondent Appearances Assessee By : None For The Assessee Revenue By : Mr Umashankar Prasad [‘Ld. Dr’] Date Of Conclusive Hearing : 25/07/2024 Date Of Pronouncement : 26/07/2024 Order Per G. D. Padmahshali, Am; This Appeal Of The Assessee Challenges The Din & Order No. Itba/Nfac/S/250/2023-24/1062379260(1) Dt. 11/03/2024 Passed U/S 250 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 [‘The Act’ Hereinafter] By The National Faceless Appeal Centre [‘Nfac’ Hereinafter] Which In Turn Arisen Out Of Order Of Assessment Passed U/S 144 R.W.S. 147 Of The Act By The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(12), Aurangabad [‘Ao’ Hereinafter] For Assessment Year 2012-13 [‘Ay’ Hereinafter];

For Appellant: None for the AssesseeFor Respondent: Mr Umashankar Prasad [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 142(1)Section 144Section 148Section 250Section 69A

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ‘SMC’ BENCH PUNE BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI G. D. PADMAHSHALI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI VINAY BHAMORE, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year : 2012-13 Dilip Rangnath Pagare Plot No. 23, Gut No. 105, PWD Housing Society, Aurangaba-431001. PAN: BJCPP2914G. . . . . . . . Appellant V/s The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(12), Aurangabad. . . . . . . . Respondent Appearances Assessee by : None for the Assessee Revenue by : Mr Umashankar Prasad [‘Ld. DR’] Date of conclusive Hearing : 25/07/2024 Date of Pronouncement : 26/07/2024 ORDER PER G. D. PADMAHSHALI, AM; This appeal of the assessee challe…

Garg v. PCIT (113 Taxmann.com 93) — Cited in 11 Judgments | BharatTax