Fiserve India (P.) Ltd. v. ITO

60 Taxmann.com 48Reported decision2015#9870 most cited
11

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2016 to 2024.

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Fiserve India (P.) Ltd. v. ITO

APPLIED MATERIALS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands partly allowed

ITA 209/BANG/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore30 Nov 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillaiit(Tp)A No. 209/Bang/2021 Assessment Year : 2016-17 M/S. Applied Materials India Pvt. Ltd., Unit -5, 3Rd Floor, The Deputy Explorer Building, Commissioner Of International Tech Income Tax, Park, Circle – 1(1)(1), Whitefield Road, Vs. Bangalore. Bangalore – 560 001. Pan: Aaeca2635C Appellant Respondent : Shri T. Suryanarayana, Assessee By Advocate : Dr. Manjunath Karkihalli, Revenue By Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing : 30-11-2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 30-11-2022 Order Per Beena Pillaipresent Appeal Is Filed By Assessee Against The Order Dated 31/03/2021 Passed By The National E-Assessment Centre, Delhi For A.Y. 2016-17 On Following Grounds Of Appeal:

For Respondent: Shri T. Suryanarayana
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 195Section 40Section 92C

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘B’ BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SMT. BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER IT(TP)A No. 209/Bang/2021 Assessment Year : 2016-17 M/s. Applied Materials India Pvt. Ltd., Unit -5, 3rd Floor, The Deputy Explorer Building, Commissioner of International Tech Income Tax, Park, Circle – 1(1)(1), Whitefield Road, Vs. Bangalore. Bangalore – 560 001. PAN: AAECA2635C APPELLANT RESPONDENT : Shri T. Suryanarayana, Assessee by Advocate : Dr. Manjunath Karkihalli, Revenue by CIT-DR Date of Hearing : 30-11-2022 Date of Pronouncement : 30-11-2022 ORDER PER BEENA…

CITRIX R & D INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE- 2(1)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed partly as indicated herein above

ITA 220/BANG/2021[2016-17`]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore25 Aug 2022

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillaiit(Tp)A No. 220/Bang/2021 Assessment Year : 2016-17 M/S. Citrix R&D India Pvt. Ltd., The Deputy Prestige Dynasty, Commissioner Of Ground Floor, Income Tax, 33/2, Ulsoor Road, Circle – 2(1)(1), Bangalore – 560042. Vs. Bangalore. Pan: Aabcn3639C Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri Sumit Khurana, Ca Revenue By : Shri M. Mathivanan, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing : 04-07-2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 25-08-2022 Order Per Beena Pillaipresent Appeal By The Assessee Has Been Filed By Assessee Against The Assessment Order Dated 30/03/2021 Passed By The National E-Assessment Centre, Delhi Relating To Assessment Year 2016-17 On Following Grounds Of Appeal: “The Grounds Mentioned Herein By The Appellant Are Without Prejudice To One Another. 1. That The Order Passed By The Learned Ao To The Extent Prejudicial To The Appellant, Is Bad In Law & Liable To Be Quashed. Transfer Pricing - 2. That The National E-Assessment Centre, Delhi / Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 2(1)(1), Bangalore ("Assessing Officer" Or "Learned Ao") & The Dispute Resolution Panel - 1 ("Learned Panel" Or "Learned Drp")

For Appellant: Shri Sumit Khurana, CAFor Respondent: Shri M. Mathivanan, CIT-DR

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘C’ BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SMT. BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER IT(TP)A No. 220/Bang/2021 Assessment Year : 2016-17 M/s. Citrix R&D India Pvt. Ltd., The Deputy Prestige Dynasty, Commissioner of Ground Floor, Income Tax, 33/2, Ulsoor Road, Circle – 2(1)(1), Bangalore – 560042. Vs. Bangalore. PAN: AABCN3639C APPELLANT RESPONDENT Assessee by : Shri Sumit Khurana, CA Revenue by : Shri M. Mathivanan, CIT-DR Date of Hearing : 04-07-2022 Date of Pronouncement : 25-08-2022 ORDER PER BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER Present appeal by the assesse…

ATOS INDIA P. LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT RG 8(1), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1467/MUM/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Jun 2016AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Shri Ashwani Tanejaassessment Year: 2009-10 Atos India Pvt. Ltd., Dcit 8(1) Godrej & Boyce Complex, Aayakar Bhavan, बनाम/ Plant 5, Pirojshanagar, Vs. Lbs Marg, Vikhroli(W) Mumbai Mumbai-400079 (Assessee) (Revenue) P.A. No.Aaaco2461J "नधा"रती क" ओर से / Assessee By Shri Kanchan Kaushal Shri Dhanesh Bafna Shri Ali Asgar Rampurwala (Ar) Shri N.K. Chand (Dr) राज"व क" ओर से / Revenue By सुनवाई क" तार"ख / 05/04/2016 Date Of Hearing : 30/06/2016 आदेश क" तार"ख /Date Of Order: आदेश / O R D E R Per Ashwani Taneja (): This Appeal Has Been Filed By The Assessee Against The Final Assessment Order Dated 16.01.2014 143(3) R.W.S. 144C(13) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 Passed In Pursuance To The Directions Given By The Dispute Resolution Panel (In Short

Section 10A

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, मुंबई "यायपीठ,K,मुंबई । IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCHES “K”, MUMBAI Before Shri Saktijit Dey, Judicial Member, and Shri Ashwani Taneja, Accountant Member Assessment Year: 2009-10 Atos India Pvt. Ltd., DCIT 8(1) Godrej & Boyce Complex, Aayakar Bhavan, बनाम/ Plant 5, Pirojshanagar, Vs. LBS Marg, Vikhroli(W) Mumbai Mumbai-400079 (Assessee) (Revenue) P.A. No.AAACO2461J "नधा"रती क" ओर से / Assessee by Shri Kanchan Kaushal Shri Dhanesh Bafna Shri Ali Asgar Rampurwala (AR) Shri N.K. Chand (DR) राज"व क" ओर से / Revenue by सुनवाई क" तार"ख / 05/04/2016 Date of Hearing : 30/06/2016 आ…

Fiserve India (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (60 Taxmann.com 48) — Cited in 11 Judgments | BharatTax