Finastra Software Solutions (India) (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT

93 Taxmann.com 460Income Tax Appellate Tribunal2018#8201 most cited
14

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2018 to 2026.

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Finastra Software Solutions (India) (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT

NOVELL SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. ITO, BANGALORE

In the result, appeal filed by assessee stands allowed and appeal filed by the revenue stands dismissed

ITA 319/BANG/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 Apr 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri. Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillaiit(Tp)A No. 280/Bang/2016 Assessment Year : 2011-12 M/S. Micro Focus Software India Pvt. Ltd. (Earlier Known As Novell Software Development The Income Tax (India) Pvt. Ltd.), Officer, Bagmane Tech Park ‘D’ Ward – 4 (1)(3), Block, Bangalore. ‘Laurel’ 65/2, Vs. C V Raman Nagar, Byrasandra, Bangalore – 560 093. Pan: Aaacn6992K Appellant Respondent & It(Tp)A No. 319/Bang/2016 Assessment Year : 2011-12 (By Assessee) : Smt. Tanmayee Rajkumar, Assessee By Advocate : Dr. Manjunath Karkihalli, Cit Revenue By (Dr) Date Of Hearing : 03-03-2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 29-04-2022 Order Per Beena Pillaipresent Cross Appeals Has Been Filed By Revenue As Well As Assessee Against Order Dated 29.12.2015 Passed By Ld.Ito Ward 5(1)(1)

Section 143(3)Section 144C(13)Section 92C(3)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘B’ BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI. CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SMT. BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER IT(TP)A No. 280/Bang/2016 Assessment Year : 2011-12 M/s. Micro Focus Software India Pvt. Ltd. (earlier known as Novell Software Development The Income Tax (India) Pvt. Ltd.), Officer, Bagmane Tech Park ‘D’ Ward – 4 (1)(3), Block, Bangalore. ‘LAUREL’ 65/2, Vs. C V Raman Nagar, Byrasandra, Bangalore – 560 093. PAN: AAACN6992K APPELLANT RESPONDENT & IT(TP)A No. 319/Bang/2016 Assessment Year : 2011-12 (By Assessee) : Smt. Tanmayee Rajkumar, Assessee by Advocate : Dr. Manjun…

ITO WARD - 5(1)(1), BANGALORE vs. M/S NOVELL SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT (INDIA) PVT. LTD.,, BANGALORE

In the result, appeal filed by assessee stands allowed and appeal filed by the revenue stands dismissed

ITA 280/BANG/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 Apr 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri. Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillaiit(Tp)A No. 280/Bang/2016 Assessment Year : 2011-12 M/S. Micro Focus Software India Pvt. Ltd. (Earlier Known As Novell Software Development The Income Tax (India) Pvt. Ltd.), Officer, Bagmane Tech Park ‘D’ Ward – 4 (1)(3), Block, Bangalore. ‘Laurel’ 65/2, Vs. C V Raman Nagar, Byrasandra, Bangalore – 560 093. Pan: Aaacn6992K Appellant Respondent & It(Tp)A No. 319/Bang/2016 Assessment Year : 2011-12 (By Assessee) : Smt. Tanmayee Rajkumar, Assessee By Advocate : Dr. Manjunath Karkihalli, Cit Revenue By (Dr) Date Of Hearing : 03-03-2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 29-04-2022 Order Per Beena Pillaipresent Cross Appeals Has Been Filed By Revenue As Well As Assessee Against Order Dated 29.12.2015 Passed By Ld.Ito Ward 5(1)(1)

Section 143(3)Section 144C(13)Section 92C(3)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘B’ BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI. CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SMT. BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER IT(TP)A No. 280/Bang/2016 Assessment Year : 2011-12 M/s. Micro Focus Software India Pvt. Ltd. (earlier known as Novell Software Development The Income Tax (India) Pvt. Ltd.), Officer, Bagmane Tech Park ‘D’ Ward – 4 (1)(3), Block, Bangalore. ‘LAUREL’ 65/2, Vs. C V Raman Nagar, Byrasandra, Bangalore – 560 093. PAN: AAACN6992K APPELLANT RESPONDENT & IT(TP)A No. 319/Bang/2016 Assessment Year : 2011-12 (By Assessee) : Smt. Tanmayee Rajkumar, Assessee by Advocate : Dr. Manjun…

ARCTERN CONSULTING PRIVATE LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. ASST.C.I.T., BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 279/BANG/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore28 Oct 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri George George K, Jm & Shri B.R.Baskaran, Am It(Tp)A No.279/Bang/2016 : Asst.Year 2011-2012 M/S.Arctern Consulting Private The Asst.Commissioner Of Limited, 49/8, 2Nd Floor, 60 Feet Income-Tax, Circle 1(1)(1) V. Bangalore. Road, Near Jyothi Nivas College, Koranmangala Industrial Layout Bangalore. Pan : Aaeca9113F. (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By : Smt.Tanmayee Rajkumar, Advocate Respondent By : Sri.Sumer Singh Meena, Cit(Osd)-Dr Date Of Pronouncement : 28.10.2021 Date Of Hearing : 27.10.2021 O R D E R Per George George K, Jm This Appeal At The Instance Of The Assessee Is Directed Against Final Assessment Order Dated 17.12.2015 Passed U/S 143(3) R.W.S. 144C Of The I.T.Act. The Relevant Assessment Year Is 2011-2012. 2. The Brief Facts Of The Case Are As Follows: The Assessee Is A Company Engaged In Providing Contract Software Development (Swd) Services & Information Technology Enabled (Ite) Services To Its Associate Enterprises (Aes). For The Assessment Year 2011-2012, The Assessee Had Filed Return Of Income On 30.11.2011 Declaring Loss Of Rs.92,43,787. Later, Revised Return On 08.02.2012 Declaring Loss Of Rs.44,54,773. The Assessment Was Selected For Scrutiny By Issuance Of Notice U/S 143(2) Of The I.T.Act.

For Appellant: Smt.Tanmayee Rajkumar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sri.Sumer Singh Meena, CIT(OSD)-DR
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 92C

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL BANGALORE BENCHES “A”, BANGALORE Before Shri George George K, JM and Shri B.R.Baskaran, AM IT(TP)A No.279/Bang/2016 : Asst.Year 2011-2012 M/s.Arctern Consulting Private The Asst.Commissioner of Limited, 49/8, 2nd Floor, 60 Feet Income-tax, Circle 1(1)(1) v. Bangalore. Road, Near Jyothi Nivas College, Koranmangala Industrial Layout Bangalore. PAN : AAECA9113F. (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by : Smt.Tanmayee Rajkumar, Advocate Respondent by : Sri.Sumer Singh Meena, CIT(OSD)-DR Date of Pronouncement : 28.10.2021 Date of Hearing : 27.10.2021 O R D E R Per George George K, J…

ARCTERN CONSULTING PRIVATE LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BANGALORE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 352/BANG/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore11 Oct 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan & Shri B. R. Baskaranit(Tp)A No.352/Bang/2017 Assessment Year : 2012-13 M/S. Arctern Consulting Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Embassy Tech Village, Income-Tax, Tower 2B Hibiscus, 5Th Floor, Circle – 1(1)(2), Deverabeesanahalli, Bengaluru. Bengaluru – 560 037. Pan : Aaeca 9113 F Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri. T. Suryanarayana, Advocate Revenue By : Shri. Pradeep Kumar, Cit-Dr(Itat)(Bengaluru) Date Of Hearing : 09.10.2019 Date Of Pronouncement : 15.10.2019 O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri. T. Suryanarayana, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. Pradeep Kumar, CIT-DR(ITAT)(Bengaluru)
Section 10ASection 143(3)Section 92

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI N. V. VASUDEVAN, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI B. R. BASKARAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER IT(TP)A No.352/Bang/2017 Assessment year : 2012-13 M/s. Arctern Consulting Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Embassy Tech Village, Income-tax, Tower 2B Hibiscus, 5th Floor, Circle – 1(1)(2), Deverabeesanahalli, Bengaluru. Bengaluru – 560 037. PAN : AAECA 9113 F APPELLANT RESPONDENT Assessee by : Shri. T. Suryanarayana, Advocate Revenue by : Shri. Pradeep Kumar, CIT-DR(ITAT)(Bengaluru) Date of hearing : 09.10.2019 Date of Pronouncement : 15.10.2019 O R D E R Per N.…