Ershisanye Construction Group India (P) Ltd. v. DCIT

84 Taxmann.com 108Reported decision2017#8743 most cited
13

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2018 to 2022.

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Ershisanye Construction Group India (P) Ltd. v. DCIT

M/S. INFOSYS BPO LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE-1(1), BANGALORE

In the result, appeal by the assessee is allowed

ITA 989/BANG/2017[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore01 Sept 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri Chandra Poojariit(It)A No.989/Bang/2017 Assessment Year : 2016-17 M/S. Infosys Bpo Limited Vs. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Electronic City, Hosur Road, Tax, Bengaluru – 560 100. International Taxation, Pan : Aaccp 4478 N Circle 1(1), Bengaluru. Appellant Respondent Appellant By : Shri. Padam Chand Khincha, Ca Respondent By : Shri. K. R. Narayana, Addl. Cit(Dr)(Itat), Bengaluru Date Of Hearing : 25.08.2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 01.09.2022 O R D E R Per N. V. Vasudevan: This Is An Appeal By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 28.02.2017 Of Cit(A) - 12, Bengaluru, Relating To Assessment Year 2016-17. 2. The Assessee Is A Company Engaged In The Business Of Rendering Bpo Services. The Assessee Made Payment Of 2100 Us$ To A Non- Resident Viz., Stakeholder Centered Coaching (International Ltd.,)

For Appellant: Shri. Padam Chand Khincha, CAFor Respondent: Shri. K. R. Narayana, Addl. CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 248Section 5Section 9(1)(vii)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B” BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI N.V. VASUDEVAN, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER IT(IT)A No.989/Bang/2017 Assessment Year : 2016-17 M/s. Infosys BPO Limited Vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Electronic City, Hosur Road, Tax, Bengaluru – 560 100. International Taxation, PAN : AACCP 4478 N Circle 1(1), Bengaluru. APPELLANT RESPONDENT Appellant by : Shri. Padam Chand Khincha, CA Respondent by : Shri. K. R. Narayana, Addl. CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru Date of hearing : 25.08.2022 Date of Pronouncement : 01.09.2022 O R D E R Per N. V. Vasudevan, Vice Pre…

RENAISSANCE SERVICES BV,MUMBAI vs. DDIT (IT) 2(1), MUMBAI

The appeal of the assessee is partly allowed in terms of our aforesaid observations

ITA 7159/MUM/2012[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai08 Jun 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri G.S.Pannu, Am & Shri Ravish Sood, Jm Renaissance Services Bv The Deputy Director Of C/O Bmr & Associates Llp Income-Tax (International बिधम/ Bmr House, 36B Taxation)-2(1), 1St Floor 36B, Dr. R.K Shirodkar Marg, Room No. 120, Scindia Vs. Parel, Mumbai- 400 012 House, Ballard Estate Mumbai- 400 038 स्थामी रेखा सं./ जीआइआय सं./ Pan No. Aaecr4995E (अऩीराथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) :

For Appellant: S/shri Paras S. Savla and PratikFor Respondent: Shri M.V. Rajguru, Sr.D.R
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144C(3)Section 234BSection 250

…P a g e | 1 ITA No. 7159/Mum/2012 A.Y 2009-10 Renaissance Services BV Vs. The DDIT (I.T.) IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “L” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI G.S.PANNU, AM AND SHRI RAVISH SOOD, JM Renaissance Services BV The Deputy Director of C/o BMR & Associates LLP Income-Tax (International बिधम/ BMR House, 36B Taxation)-2(1), 1st Floor 36B, Dr. R.K Shirodkar Marg, Room No. 120, Scindia Vs. Parel, Mumbai- 400 012 House, Ballard Estate Mumbai- 400 038 स्थामी रेखा सं./ जीआइआय सं./ PAN No. AAECR4995E (अऩीराथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) : अऩीराथी की ओय से / Appellant by : S/shri Paras S. Savla and Pratik…