Dr. Smt. P. K. Vasanthi Rangarajan v. CIT

23 Taxmann.com 299High Court2012#7282 most cited
16

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2025.

Also reported as

209 Taxmann 628

Sections most often in play

Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 54FSection 263Section 68Section 115BBESection 133(6)

Issues it is cited on

section 54f(1)long-term capital assetsection 54fdate of transfersection 54section 32section 115jsection 234blong term capital gainsalaryincome from other sourcessection 115

Judgments citing Dr. Smt. P. K. Vasanthi Rangarajan v. CIT

KUSUM SAHGAL,GURUGRAM vs. ACIT,CIRCLE-19(2), DELHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 341/DEL/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi21 Nov 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri S Rifaur Rahman & Shri Vimal Kumarassessment Year: 2016-17 Kusum Sahgal, Through Lr Shri Vs. Acit, Circle-19(2), Viney Sagar Sahgal, New Delhi Mg-2002, The Magnolias, Golf Course Road Dlf Phase-V, Gurugram, 122 002 Haryana Pan :Aatps3766J (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 133(6)Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 250Section 54BSection 54ESection 54F

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCH: ‘B’ NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI S RIFAUR RAHMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI VIMAL KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year: 2016-17 Kusum Sahgal, Through LR Shri Vs. ACIT, Circle-19(2), Viney Sagar Sahgal, New Delhi MG-2002, The Magnolias, Golf Course Road DLF Phase-V, Gurugram, 122 002 Haryana PAN :AATPS3766J (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by Shri Sanjay Kumar Jain, CA & Shri Saurav Jain, Advs. Department by Shri Kailash Dan Ratnoo, CIT(DR) Date of hearing 28.08.2025 Date of pronouncement 21.11.2025 ORDER PER VIMAL KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER: The appeal filed by the…

AMARENDRA FINANCIAL PVT.LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. PR. CIT (CENTRAL) KNP , MEERUT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2526/DEL/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi26 Sept 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: the tribunal. Before us, assessee also take additional grounds of appeal which are admitted as they are purely legal in nature and requires no verification of facts by placing reliance on the judgment of hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of NTPC Ltd. reported in 229 ITR 383(SC).

Section 139(1)Section 153CSection 263Section 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘A’: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI YOGESH KUMAR U.S., JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI MANISH AGARWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Amarendra Financial Private Pr. CIT, Limited, (Central) KNP at Meerut. 14/5, Basement, Old Rajinder Vs. Nagar, Shaheed Hemu Kalani Marg, New Delhi-110060. PAN-AAHCA0512D (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by Smt. Rano Jain, Adv., Ms. Mansi Jain, CA and Shri Pranshu Singhal, CA Department by Sh. Jitender Singh, CIT- DR Date of Hearing 08/07/2025 Date of Pronouncement 26/09/2025 O R D E R PER MANISH AGARWAL, AM: This appeal is filed by the assessee against th…

SHRI VIJAY KUMAR PATEL,RAIPUR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, RAIPUR-1, RAIPUR

ITA 212/RPR/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur08 Jan 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No: 212/Rpr/2024 ("नधा"रण वष" Assessment Year: 2017-18)

For Appellant: Shri Sakshi Gopal Aggarwal, CAFor Respondent: Shri S. L. Anuragi, CIT-DR
Section 115BSection 147Section 263Section 271(1)(c)Section 271ASection 68

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, रायपुर "ायपीठ, रायपुर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL RAIPUR BENCH, RAIPUR "ी रिवश सूद, "ाियक सद" एवं "ी अ"ण खोड़िपया, लेखा सद" के सम" । BEFORE SHRI RAVISH SOOD, JM & SHRI ARUN KHODPIA, AM आयकर अपील सं. / ITA No: 212/RPR/2024 ("नधा"रण वष" Assessment Year: 2017-18) Shri Vijay Kumar Patel, v Principal Commissioner of Income Tax- Fafadih Chowk, Timber Market, s Raipur-1, Chhattisgarh Raipur-492001 (C.G.) PAN: AEOPP8115R (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ" / Respondent) . . िनधा"रती की ओर से /Assessee by : Shri Sakshi Gopal Aggarwal, CA राज" की ओर से /Revenue by : Shri S. L. Anuragi, CIT-DR सुनवाई की…

INCOME TAX OFFICER, MUMBAI vs. SHERIAR PHIROJSHA IRANI, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 2835/MUM/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Sept 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri. Om Prakash Kant & Shri. Sandeep Singh Karhail

For Appellant: Shri Anuj KisandwalaFor Respondent: Shri. Ashok Kumar Ambastha Sr. DR
Section 143Section 143(3)Section 250Section 54F

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI. OM PRAKASH KANT, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI. SANDEEP SINGH KARHAIL, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA no. 2835/Mum./2024 (Assessment Year : 2018–2019) Income Tax Officer, Room No. 526, 5th Floor, ……………. Appellant Aayakar Bhavan,M. K. Road, Maharashtra-400020 v/s Sheriar Phirojsha Irani 3, Phirojsha Building, 70C, A. K. Marg, Gowalia Tank, ……………. Respondent Maharashtra-400036 PAN-AAAPI0737Q Assessee by : Shri Anuj Kisandwala Revenue by : Shri. Ashok Kumar Ambastha Sr. DR Date of Hearing – 25/07/2024 Date of Order – 27/09/2024 O R D E R PER SANDEEP SINGH KAR…

ATUL GOVINDJI SHROFF,VADODARA vs. THE DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, VADODARA

In the result, appeal filed by the Assessee is dismissed

ITA 1443/AHD/2019[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad05 Jul 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta (Accountant Member), Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Milin Mehta, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Kamlesh Makwana, CIT/DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 2Section 234ASection 234BSection 270ASection 54F

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD “C” BENCH Before: Smt. Annapurna Gupta, Accountant Member And Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal, Judicial Member Assessment Year 2017-18 Atul Govindji Shroff. The Deputy 1028, Village Raipura, Commissioner of At Post Raipura, Vs Income Tax, Vadodara Central Cirlce-3, Gujarat-391410 Vadodara PAN: AACPS7330R (Respondent) (Appellant) Appellant by : Shri Milin Mehta, A.R. Respondent by : Shri Kamlesh Makwana, CIT/DR Date of hearing : 17-04-2024 Date of pronouncement : 05-07-2024 आदेश/ORDER PER : SIDDHARTHA NAUTIYAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER:- The present appeal has been filed by…

BALASUNDARAM MAHALAKSHMI,COIMBATORE vs. DCIT, NON CORPORATE CIRCLE-4,, COIMBATORE

The appeal stand allowed in terms of our above order

ITA 1411/CHNY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai03 Jul 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am & Hon’Ble Shri Manu Kumar Giri, Jm आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1411/Chny/2023 (िनधा9रणवष9 / Assessment Year: 2013-14) Ms. Balasundaram Mahalakshmi Dcit बनाम/ 216, Atd Road, Race Course, Non-Corporate Circle-4 Vs. Coimbatore-641 018. Coimbatore. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aiopm-6371-Q (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (" थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ" कीओरसे/ Appellant By : Shri T. Banusekar (Advocate)- Ld.Ar " थ"कीओरसे/Respondent By : Shri Nilay Baran Som (Cit)-Ld. Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 20-06-2024 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 03-07-2024 आदेश / O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri T. Banusekar (Advocate)- Ld.ARFor Respondent: Shri Nilay Baran Som (CIT)-Ld. DR
Section 143(3)Section 54F

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ‘ए’ "ायपीठ चे"ई म"। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘A’ BENCH, CHENNAI माननीय +ी मनोज कुमार अ/वाल ,लेखा सद4 एवं माननीय +ी मनु कुमार िग7र, "ाियक सद4 के सम8। BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM AND HON’BLE SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI, JM आयकरअपील सं./ ITA No.1411/Chny/2023 (िनधा9रणवष9 / Assessment Year: 2013-14) Ms. Balasundaram Mahalakshmi DCIT बनाम/ 216, ATD Road, Race Course, Non-Corporate Circle-4 Vs. Coimbatore-641 018. Coimbatore. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No. AIOPM-6371-Q (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (" थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ" कीओरसे/ Appellant by : Shri T. Banusekar (Advocate)- Ld.A…

SHWETA SINGH,MUMBAI vs. ITO-WARD 33(3)(2), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is allowed

ITA 3528/MUM/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai21 Mar 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail

For Appellant: Shri Vipul JoshiFor Respondent: Shri Manoj Kumar
Section 250Section 54F

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “G” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI SANDEEP SINGH KARHAIL, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA no.3528/Mum./2023 (Assessment Year : 2013–14) Shweta Singh 1406, „B‟ Wing, Building no.2 ……………. Appellant Silver Oak, Raheja Willows, Akurli Road Lokhandwala, Mumbai 400 101 PAN – AXHPS7021F v/s Income Tax Officer ……………. Respondent Ward–33(3)(2), Mumbai Assessee by : Shri Vipul Joshi Revenue by : Shri Manoj Kumar Date of Hearing – 14/03/2024 Date of Order – 21/03/2024 O R D E R PER SANDEEP SINGH KARHAIL, J.M. The present appeal has been filed by the ass…

MANOJ TEKRIWAL,MUMBAI vs. DCIT RG 24(2), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 4147/MUM/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai13 Jul 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Pramod Kumar & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail

For Appellant: Shri G.P. MehtaFor Respondent: Shri T. Shankar, Sr. AR CIT
Section 14ASection 234ASection 250Section 40Section 54

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “D” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI PRAMOD KUMAR, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI SANDEEP SINGH KARHAIL, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA no.4147/Mum./2015 (Assessment Year : 2010–11) Manoj Tekriwal Harishchandra Apartments ……………. Appellant Raheja Township, Malad (East) Mumbai 400 097 PAN – ABTPT8105D v/s Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax ……………. Respondent Range–24(2), Mumbai Assessee by : Shri G.P. Mehta Revenue by : Shri T. Shankar, Sr. AR CIT Date of Hearing – 05.05.2022 Date of Order – 13/07/2022 O R D E R PER SANDEEP SINGH KARHAIL, J.M. The present appeal has been filed by the assessee challeng…

ANANT R GAWANDE,MUMBAI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed and AO is directed to give consequential relief

ITA 5453/MUM/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai14 Jun 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy () & Shri Gagan Goyal ()

Section 54Section 54F

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “SMC”, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY (JUDICIAL MEMBER) AND SHRI GAGAN GOYAL (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) I.T.A No.5453/Mum/2019 (Assessment year: 2013-14) Anant R Gawande vs Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax 801, Mahalaxmi Chambers Circle-20(1), Mumbai 22, Bhulabhai Desai Road Mumbai-400 026 PAN: AABPG3008P (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee represented by : Shri Anil Sathe Department represented by : Shri Anoop Hiswase, DR Date of hearing : 10/06/2022 Date of pronouncement : 14/06/2022 O R D E R Per: Gagan Goyal (AM): This appeal has been filed by the assessee aga…

ITO NON CORPORATE WARD 2(1), CHENNAI vs. A.M.K.SHAHUL HAMEED, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1253/CHNY/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai24 Jan 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunathaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.1253/Chny/2019 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2012-13 The Income Tax Officer, Shri A.M.K. Shahul Hameed, Non Corporate Ward 2(1), Vs. Old No. 5, New No. 9, Rangan Street, Chennai 600 034. T. Nagar, Chennai 600 017. [Pan:Aabph6895F] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri Ar V. Sreenivasan, Addl. Cit ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri B. Ramakrishnan, C.A. सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 03.01.2022 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 24.01.2022 आदेश /O R D E R Per V. Durga Rao: The Appeal Filed By The Revenue Is Directed Against The Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-2, Chennai Dated 11.01.2019 Relevant To The Assessment Year 2012-13. 2. Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Assessee Filed His Return Of Income For The Assessment Year 2012-13 On 01.06.2013 Admitting Total Income Of ₹.10,82,700/-. The Case Was Selected For Scrutiny & After Following Due Process, The Assessment Was Completed Under Section 2

For Appellant: Shri AR V. Sreenivasan, Addl. CITFor Respondent: Shri B. Ramakrishnan, C.A
Section 2Section 54Section 54F

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, ’बी’ "ायपीठ, चे"ई IN THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘B’ BENCH, CHENNAI "ी वी दुगा" राव "ाियक सद" एवं "ी जी. म॑जुनाथा, लेखा सद" के सम" Before Shri V. Durga Rao, Judicial Member & Shri G. Manjunatha, Accountant Member आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.1253/Chny/2019 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2012-13 The Income Tax Officer, Shri A.M.K. Shahul Hameed, Non Corporate Ward 2(1), Vs. Old No. 5, New No. 9, Rangan Street, Chennai 600 034. T. Nagar, Chennai 600 017. [PAN:AABPH6895F] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant by : Shri AR V. Sreenivasan, Addl. CIT ""थ" की ओर से/Respon…

RAMESH CHANDER BHASIN,NEW DELHI vs. ITO WARD - 53(5), NEW DELHI

ITA 161/DEL/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi13 Aug 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Shri R.S. Singhvi, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Jagdish Singh Dahiya, Sr. D.R
Section 54ESection 54F

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHES “E” : DELHI BEFORE SHRI BHAVNESH SAINI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA.No.161/Del./2020 Assessment Year 2014-2015 Smt. Savita Bhasin, Wife The ITO, Ward – 53 (5), And L.R. of Shri Ramesh [ Chander Bhasin, 802, Civic Centre, vs. Tolstoy House, Tolstoy Marg, New Delhi – 110 001. New Delhi. PAN AACPB3843Q (Appellant) (Respondent) For Assessee : Shri R.S. Singhvi, C.A. For Revenue : Shri Jagdish Singh Dahiya, Sr. D.R. Date of Hearing : 10.08.2020 Date of Pronouncement : 13.08.2020 ORDER PER BHAVNESH SAINI, J.M. This appeal by…

HEMANT SHAH,MUMBAI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-20(1), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 4566/MUM/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai25 Feb 2020AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri R.C. Sharma (A.M.) & Shri Pawan Singh (Jm) Hemant Shah Acit-20(1), Mumbai 10, Oomed Sadan 58, Sion, Mumbai 400 022 Vs Pan : Aadps2405E Appellant Respondednt

Section 143(3)Section 54Section 54ESection 54F

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “H”, MUMBAI Before Shri R.C. Sharma (A.M.) & Shri Pawan Singh (JM) Hemant Shah ACIT-20(1), Mumbai 10, Oomed Sadan 58, Sion, Mumbai 400 022 Vs PAN : AADPS2405E APPELLANT RESPONDEDNT Appellant by Shri Paresh Vakharia Respondent by Shri Manoj Kumar Singh Sr DR & R. Bhoopati Sr DR Date of hearing 13.12.2019 Date of pronouncement 25.02.2020 O R D E R PER PAWAN SINGH, JM : 1. This appeal by assessee is directed against the order of learned Commissioner of Income –tax- 32 [‘ld.CIT(A)’], Mumbai for assessment year 2013-14. The assessee has raised the following grou…

THE ITO-19(3)(4), MUMBAI vs. SUNITHA R. ASHOK, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 5108/MUM/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Jun 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri C.N. Prasad, Hon'Ble & Shri N.K. Pradhan, Hon'Bleincome Tax Officer – 19(3)(4) V. Smt Sunitha R. Ashok 2Nd Matru Mandir, Floor, B-30, Mayfair Garden, Room No. 210, Tardeo Road, Little Gibbs Road, Malabar Hills, Mumbai – 400007 Mumbai – 400 006

For Appellant: Shri K.K. LalkakaFor Respondent: Shri V. Vidhyadhar
Section 54F

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “G”, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI C.N. PRASAD, HON'BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI N.K. PRADHAN, HON'BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Income Tax Officer – 19(3)(4) v. Smt Sunitha R. Ashok 2nd Matru Mandir, Floor, B-30, Mayfair Garden, Room No. 210, Tardeo Road, Little Gibbs Road, Malabar Hills, Mumbai – 400007 Mumbai – 400 006 PAN NO: ADEPA 8529 M (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri K.K. Lalkaka Department by : Shri V. Vidhyadhar Date of Hearing : 05.04.2018 Date of Pronouncement : 20.06.2018 O R D E R PER C.N. PRASAD 1. This appeal is filed by the Revenue against the order o…

PRAMOD SHARMA,MUMBAI vs. ACIT - 35(2), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stood dismissed

ITA 6440/MUM/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 May 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri C.N Prasad & Shri Ramit Kochar

For Appellant: Shri K. Gopal/For Respondent: Shri Rajat Mittal (DR)
Section 143(3)Section 54Section 54F

…आयकर अपीऱीय अधिकरण “C” न्यायपीठ म ुंबई में। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI C.N PRASAD, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI RAMIT KOCHAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपीऱ सं./I.T.A. No.6440/Mum/2016 (नििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2012-13) Pramod Sharma बिाम/ ACIT-35(2) Flat No. 12A01, Interface Pratyakshakar Bhavan, Heights, 13 th Floor, „C‟ Wing, Bandra Kurla Road, v. Off Link Road, Malad(West), Bandra (E) Mumbai-400064 Mumbai 400051 स्थायी ऱेखा सं./ PAN : AMYPS6428E (अपीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. Assessee by: Shri K. Gopal/ Ms. Neha Paranjpe Revenue by : Shri Rajat Mit…

DCIT 5(2)(2), MUMBAI vs. DAWOOD ABDULHUSSAIN GANDHI, MUMBAI

ITA 3788/MUM/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai31 Jan 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Rajendra, Am & Shri Ravish Sood, Jm Ita Nos. 3788/Mum/2016 (निर्धारण वषा / Assessment Years:2011-12) Dy. Commissioner Of Income Shri Dawood Abdulhussain बिधम/ Tax-5(2)(2), Room No. 571, Gandhi, 102, Lohar Chawl, 5Th Floor, Aayakar Bhawan, Mumbai 400002. Vs. M.K. Road, Mumbai-400 020 स्थामी रेखा सं./ जीआइआय सं./ Pan No. Aabpg4337K (अऩीराथी /Revenue) (प्रत्मथी / Assessee) :

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Joshi, A.RFor Respondent: Ms. Pooja Swaroop, D.R
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 54FSection 54F(1)

…P a g e | 1 DCIT Vs. Shri Dawood Abdulhussain Gandhi IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “F” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI RAJENDRA, AM AND SHRI RAVISH SOOD, JM ITA Nos. 3788/Mum/2016 (निर्धारण वषा / Assessment Years:2011-12) Dy. Commissioner of Income Shri Dawood Abdulhussain बिधम/ Tax-5(2)(2), Room No. 571, Gandhi, 102, Lohar Chawl, 5th Floor, Aayakar Bhawan, Mumbai 400002. Vs. M.K. Road, Mumbai-400 020 स्थामी रेखा सं./ जीआइआय सं./ PAN No. AABPG4337K (अऩीराथी /Revenue) (प्रत्मथी / Assessee) : अऩीराथी की ओय से / Revenue by : Ms. Pooja Swaroop, D.R प्रत्मथी की ओय से/Assessee by : Shri Nitesh Joshi, A.R सुनवाई क…

RAM MOHAN RAI,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, NEW DELHI

In the result ground No. 2 and 3 of the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 6612/DEL/2016[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi10 Apr 2017AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri H.S.Sidhu & Shri Prashant Maharishiram Mohan Rai, Vs. Acit, A-8/25, Vansant Vihar, Circle-33(1), New Delhi New Delhi Pan:Aaapr0728C (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Sh. Ved Jain, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. FR Meena, Sr. DR
Section 143Section 234BSection 54

…Ram Mohan Rai ACIT 6612/Del/2016 AY 2013-14 INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ―F‖: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI H.S.SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Ram Mohan Rai, Vs. ACIT, A-8/25, Vansant Vihar, Circle-33(1), New Delhi New Delhi PAN:AAAPR0728C (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Sh. Ved Jain, Adv Sh. Ashish Chadha, CA Revenue by: Sh. FR Meena, Sr. DR Date of Hearing 06/04/2017 Date of pronouncement 10/04/2017 O R D E R PER PRASHANT MAHARISHI, A. M. 1. The assessee against the order of the ld CIT (A)-11, prefers this appeal, New Delhi dated 21.03.2016 for the Assessment…