ARIHANT ASSOCIATES ,MUMBAI vs. PR. CIT-17, MUMBAI
In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed
ITA 865/MUM/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai22 Dec 2022AY 2016-17
Bench: Shri Amit Shukla, Hon'Ble & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Blearihant Associates V. Pr.Cit – Mumbai – 17 Anand Tower-C, Bldg.42 Room No. 120, 1St Floor Tilak Nagar, Chembur Kautilya Bhavan, C-41 To C-43 G-Block, Bandra Kurla Complex Mumbai -400089 Bandra(E), Mumbai - 400051 Pan: Aapfa1588C (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee Represented By : Shri Ruturaj Gurjar Department Represented By : Shri R.M. Madhavi
Section 1Section 143(3)Section 263Section 314(8)Section 43C
…or the payment of stamp duty. For the proposition that the letter of allotment constitutes an agreement for transfer reliance can be placed on the ratio of the decision of the Supreme court in the case of DLF Universal Ltd. V. Appropriate Authority & another (243 ITR 730) (SC). We request you to review of list of agreements registered during the year for which agreement value is less than Municipal Ready reckoner value of AY 2016-17. In this Annexure we have given details regarding date of allotment letter, date of first amount received from customer, Market Value on the date of allotment. Thus when market 4 Ari…