Delhi in Eicher Motors Ltd. v. CIT

86 Taxmann.com 49High Court2017#4073 most cited

What is Delhi in Eicher Motors Ltd. v. CIT authority for?

The Assessing Officer must record reasons to disagree with the assessee's claim of incurring no expenditure for exempt income, as required by Section 14A and Rule 8D.

29

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,005 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2025.

Also referred to as

Eicher Motors Ltd. v. CIT · section 14A · section 10(35) · Rule 8D · exempt income · disallowance of expenditure · Assessing Officer satisfaction · Delhi High Court

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Delhi in Eicher Motors Ltd. v. CIT

Prime Mineral Exports Private Limited (Now Amalgamated With Fomento Resources Private Limited), Panaji vs. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, Range - 1, Panaji

The appeal stands partly allowed for statistical purpose in aforestated terms

ITA 3/PAN/2023[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji05 Jun 2025AY 2009-10

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliita Nos. 003/Pan/2023 Assessment Year : 2009-10 Prime Mineral Exports Pvt. Ltd. (Now Amalgamated With Fomento Resources Pvt. Ltd.) 102, 1St Fl. Kamat Metropolis-1, Behind Caculo Mall, St. Inez, Panaji, Goa-403001. . . . . . . .Appellant Pan : Aadcp1647E V/S Jt. Commissioner Of Income Tax, . . . . . . . Respondent Range-1, Panaji, Goa

For Appellant: Mr Nishant Thakkar [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Mr M. Satish [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 246ASection 250Section 253(1)Section 41(1)Section 4I

…led to comply with condition precedent in advancing to determine the impugned disallowance u/r 8D(2)(iii) (Supra). To drive home former twin contentions the Ld. AR placed reliance on ‘UOI Vs Rajeev Bansal’ [2024, 469 ITR 46 (SC)], ‘Eicher Motors Ltd. Vs CIT’ [86 Taxmann.com 49 (Del)], ‘CIT Vs UP Electronics Corp. Ltd.’ [2017, 88 Taxmann.com 696 (All)], ‘CIT Vs Sociedade De Fomento Industrial (P). Ltd’ [2021, 123 Taxmann.com 38 (Bom)], and also the decision of Ld. Co-ordinate benches in the case of ‘DCIT Vs West Bengal Electronics Industry Development Corp. Ltd.’ [Manu/IK/0324/2018], and ‘Infrastructure Logistics…

Delhi in Eicher Motors Ltd. v. CIT (86 Taxmann.com 49) — Cited in 29 Judgments | BharatTax