Delhi in CIT v. Abhinav Kumar Mittal
351 ITR 20High Court2013#2452 most cited
What is Delhi in CIT v. Abhinav Kumar Mittal authority for?
In a search assessment under Section 153C following a Section 132 search, an Assessing Officer cannot refer property valuation to a District Valuation Officer (DVO) for additions under Section 69 unless incriminating material regarding undervaluation is found during the search. Any DVO valuation made without such material is invalid.
47
judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2025.
Also referred to as
CIT v. Abhinav Kumar Mittal · Abhinav Kumar Mittal · Section 69 · Section 132 · Section 153C · District Valuation Officer · DVO reference · property valuation · search assessment · incriminating material · unexplained investment · validity of DVO report
Issues it is cited on
Judgments citing Delhi in CIT v. Abhinav Kumar Mittal
Showing 1–20 of 47 · Page 1 of 3