M/S U.P AWAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHAD,LUCKNOW vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW
In the result, the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed whereas the Cross Objections of the Revenue are partly allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 701/LKW/2019[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow10 Jun 2022AY 2017-18
Bench: Shri A. D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoor
Section 11Section 12Section 12ASection 13(8)Section 2(15)
…In 1918, expression was inserted in Indian Income Tax Act, 1918 adding the phrase "advancement of other objects of general public utility", without any restriction or qualification whatever in Explanation to Section 4 (3). In Trustees of Tribute, in re (1935) 3 ITR 246, 272 (Lah) Justice Tek Chand remarked, that Indian legislature, has used a phraseology which is much wider and more comprehensive than that of fourth head of classification in Special Commissioner Versus Pemsel (supra). The aforesaid remarks of Justice Tek Chand were approved by judicial committee of Privy Council in Trustees of the Tribute, In re…