CAMBRIDGE SOLUTIONS LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. DCIT, BANGALORE
In the result, the assessee’s appeal is allowed
ITA 1469/BANG/2010[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore06 Feb 2017AY 2006-07
Bench: Shri. Vijay Pal Rao & Shri. S. Jayaraman
For Appellant: Shri. Chavali Narayan, CAFor Respondent: Shri. G. R. Reddy, CIT, DR-I
Section 10Section 10ASection 144C(5)
…h India Corporation (Agencies) Ltd v CIT (2006) [209 CTR 233] b. Hon'ble Calcutta HC decision in the case of CIT vs. East India Hotels Limited (2001) [252 ITR 860] c. Hon'ble Jaipur Tribunal decision in the case of Modem Syntex (India) Ltd vs. Dy CIT (2005) [95 TTJ 161] d. Hon'ble Mumbai Tribunal decision in the case of J.M. Shares and Stock Brokers Ltd vs. DCIT (2003) [83 TTJ 1052] and e Hon'ble Mumbai Tribunal decision in the case of Voltas Ltd vs. CCIT (1998) [61 TTJ 543] In this regard, the DRP held as under : “The assessee had claimed deduction of Rs.5,26,55,104/- as arrangement fees ITA.1469/Bang/2010 P…