DCIT v. M/s Sobha Developers

58 Taxmann.com 107High Court2015#9840 most cited

What is DCIT v. M/s Sobha Developers authority for?

Disallowance under section 14A cannot be added back for computing book profits under section 115JB, deviating from a divergent view.

11

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,314 Indian tax judgments — from 2018 to 2022.

Also referred to as

DCIT v. Sobha Developers · section 115JB · section 14A · book profit · MAT · disallowance · add back · divergent view · transfer pricing adjustment

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing DCIT v. M/s Sobha Developers

Shreno Limited, Baroda vs. The ACIT, Circle-4, Now Circle-2(1)(1), Baroda

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 251/AHD/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad25 May 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Tribunal Against The Order Of Learned Cit(A)-2, Vadodara, Dated 19.11.2015 Passed For A.Y. 2011-12. 2. The Grounds Of Appeal Taken By The Assessee Are Not In Consonance With Rule 8 Of Itat Rules, They Are Descriptive & Argumentative In Nature. In Brief, In The First Fold Of Grievance, Assessee Pleaded That The Learned Cit(A) Has Erred In Confirming The Disallowance Required To Be Made U/S. 14A Of The Income Tax Act, 1962 Read With Rule 8D Of The Income Tax Rules. Learned Counsel For The

Section 10(34)Section 143(2)Section 14A

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD “A” BENCH AHMADABAD आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, अहमदाबाद "यायपीठ ‘ए’ Before: Shri Pramod Kumar, Accountant Member Shri Rajpal Yadav, Judicial Member Assessment Year : 2011-12 Shreno Limited, Vs. ACIT, Circle-4 Alembic Road, Baroda - Now 390003 Asstt. CIT, Circle-2 (1) (1), Aayakar Bhavan, Race Course Circle, Vadodara- 390007 PAN No. AABCA7953Q (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Shri S. N. Soparkar, A.R. आवेदक क" ओर से/By Assessee Shri Mudit Nagpal, Sr. D.R. राज"व क" ओर से /By Revenue 06.03.2018 सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date of Hearing 06.06.2018 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date of Pronouncement O…

DCIT v. M/s Sobha Developers (58 Taxmann.com 107) — Cited in 11 Judgments | BharatTax