RAJASTHAN STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT & INVESTMENT CORP. LTD.,JAIPUR vs. ACIT, JAIPUR
In the result, both set of cross appeals for the respective assessment years are disposed off with above directions
ITA 380/JPR/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur29 Mar 2018AY 2013-14
For Appellant: Shri P C ParwalFor Respondent: Shri Varindar Mehta (CIT) fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@
Section 115JSection 14ASection 80I
…ade as the said provision is rendered unworkable. For this, reliance is placed on following decisions: • PCIT Vs. State Bank Of Patiala (2017) 391 ITR 218 (P&H) • CCI Ltd. Vs DCIT (2012) 206 Taxmann 563 (Kar): • DCIT Vs. Gulshan Investment Company Ltd. (2013) 86 DTR 262 (Kol-Trib) In view of above, the disallowance of Rs.71,75,575/- made by AO under Rule 8D(2)(iii) is incorrect and against the provisions of the Act. 5.4 It was further submitted that this issue has been considered by the Hon’ble ITAT in assessee’s own case for AY 2011-12 vide order dated Rajasthan State Industries Development & Investment Corp.…