Conventional Fasteners v. CIT

94 Taxmann.com 80Supreme Court of India2018#5854 most cited

What is Conventional Fasteners v. CIT authority for?

Interest income earned on fixed deposits kept as security or margin money for business purposes is taxable as income from other sources, not business income. The Supreme Court upheld that such interest has no direct connection to carrying on the business.

20

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,315 Indian tax judgments — from 2022 to 2025.

Also referred to as

Conventional Fasteners v CIT · interest income · FDR · security deposit · margin money · income from other sources · business pre-requisite · section 43(5)

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Conventional Fasteners v. CIT

Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-3(1), Hyderabad vs. Sai Regency Power Corporations Private Limited, Hyderabad

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1221/HYD/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad22 Jun 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Before Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Laliet Kumarassessment Year: 2012-13 Dy.Commissioner Of Vs. Sai Regency Power Income Tax, Corporation Private Circle – 3(1), Limited, Kondapur, Hyderabad. Hyderabad. Pan : Aaccr6134R. (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Shri C.A. M.Chandramouleswar Rao Revenue By: Shri K.P.R.R. Murthy. Date Of Hearing: 14.06.2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 22.06.2022 O R D E R Per Laliet Kumar, J.M. This Is An Appeal Filed By The Revenue Having Aggrieved By The Order Passed By The Ld.Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-3, Order Dt.18.06.2019 For The Assessment Year 2012-13. 2. The Only Effective Ground Raised By The Revenue Reads As Under : “Ld.Cit(A) Erred In Deleting The Disallowance U/S. 80Ia On Interest Income Of Rs.3,00,93,705/- Without Appreciating The Fact That The Assessee Company Is Not Eligible For Deduction U/S. 80Ia On Interest Income Of Rs.3,00,93,705/- As The Income Was Not Directly Generated From Business Operations & Ignoring The Fact That Assessee Itself Has Shown Separately Such Income In The Computation Of Income For A.Y. 2010-11 & Not Claimed Deduction U/S 80Ia Thereon.”

For Appellant: Shri C.A. M.ChandramouleswarFor Respondent: Shri K.P.R.R. Murthy
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 148Section 80I

…1 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Hyderabad ‘ A ‘ Bench, Hyderabad Before Before Shri Rama Kanta Panda, Accountant Member AND Shri Laliet Kumar, Judicial Member Assessment Year: 2012-13 Dy.Commissioner of Vs. Sai Regency Power Income Tax, Corporation Private Circle – 3(1), Limited, Kondapur, Hyderabad. Hyderabad. PAN : AACCR6134R. (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by: Shri C.A. M.Chandramouleswar Rao Revenue by: Shri K.P.R.R. Murthy. Date of hearing: 14.06.2022 Date of pronouncement: 22.06.2022 O R D E R Per Laliet Kumar, J.M. This is an appeal filed by the Revenue having aggrieved by the order passed by…