RAGHAV KUMAR DHOOT,JAIPUR vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 1, JAIPUR
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed
ITA 491/JPR/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur06 Aug 2025AY 2018-19
For Appellant: Shri C.M. Agarwal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Rajesh Ojha, CIT- DR
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 292BSection 68
…dural law\nshould not ordinarily be construed as mandatory, the procedural law is\nalways subservient to and is in aid to justice. Any interpretation which\neludes or frustrates the recipient of justice is not to be followed. (See\nShreenath v. Rajesh [(1998) 4 SCC 543: AIR 1998 SC 1827])\n14. Processual law is not to be a tyrant but a servant, not an obstruction\nbut an aid to justice. Procedural prescriptions are the handmaid and not\nthe mistress, a lubricant, not a resistant in the administration of justice.\"\nIn view of the above also, the CBDT guidelines for selection of the case\nfor scrutiny needs to be…