Commissioner of Income-tax v. Mark Hospitals (P.) Ltd.

58 Taxmann.com 226High Court2015#5361 most cited

What is Commissioner of Income-tax v. Mark Hospitals (P.) Ltd. authority for?

The High Court of Madras held that when an assessee provides the names and addresses of creditors for unsecured loans, and these creditors confirm the loans and the source of funds through banking channels, the addition under Section 68 is not warranted, even if PAN cards of creditors are not provided.

22

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,314 Indian tax judgments — from 2021 to 2025.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Mark Hospitals (P.) Ltd. · Section 68 · unsecured loans · agriculturists · PAN cards · addition under section 68 · source of funds · creditworthiness of the creditor

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Commissioner of Income-tax v. Mark Hospitals (P.) Ltd.

Commissioner of Income-tax v. Mark Hospitals (P.) Ltd. (58 Taxmann.com 226) — Cited in 22 Judgments | BharatTax