Commissioner of Income Tax, Bangalore v. AMCO Power System Ltd.

62 Taxmann.com 350High Court2015#21290 most cited
4

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2019 to 2021.

Judgments citing Commissioner of Income Tax, Bangalore v. AMCO Power System Ltd.

M/S. BECHTEL FRANCE SAS ,MUMBAI vs. CIT (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)-RANGE-1, MUMBAI

ITA 830/MUM/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai12 Nov 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Pramod Kumar () & Shri Ravish Sood () M/S Bechtel France Sas Deputy Commissioner Of Income C/O. Deloitte Haskins & Sells Vs. Tax (International Taxation), Llp, 28Th Floor, Tower 3, Indiabulls Range 1(2)(2), Room No. 1811, Finance Centre, Senapati Bapat 18Th Floor, Air India Building, Marg, Elphinstone (West) Nariman Point, Mumbai – 400 013 Mumbai – 400 021 Pan No. Aaacb2195A (Assessee) (Revenue) Assessee By : Shri Sunil M. Lala, A.R Revenue By : Shri Sunil Kumar Jha, D.R Date Of Hearing : 09/11/2021 Date Of Pronouncement : 12/11/2021 Order Per Ravish Sood, J.M:

For Appellant: Shri Sunil M. Lala, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Sunil Kumar Jha, D.R
Section 115JSection 143Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 263Section 79

…ble to the case of the assessee company, the ld. A.R had relied on the ITA No. 830/Mum/2021 A.Y. 2014-15 5 M/s Bechtel France SAS Vs. DCIT(IT) Range 1(2)(2) judgment of the Hon‟ble High Court of Karnataka in the case of CIT Vs. Amco Power Systems Ltd. (2015) 62 Taxmann.com 350 (Kar). 5. Per contra, the ld. Departmental Representative (for short „D.R‟) relied on the order passed by the CIT u/s 263 of the Act. It was submitted by the ld. D.R that as the A.O had not deliberated on the provisions of Sec.79 of the Act, and not conducted any inquiry qua the set-off of the brought forward losses of the previous year a…

Commissioner of Income Tax, Bangalore v. AMCO Power System Ltd. (62 Taxmann.com 350) — Cited in 4 Judgments | BharatTax