NIRLEX SPARES PVT. LTD. vs. COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE
C.A. No.-005204-005204 - 2001Supreme Court04 Jan 2008
For Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE
…and name, more so, since it is unusual that the person who is owning a brand name would come forward to disown the same when such disowning would deprive the said person of a valuable asset. In Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Bhalla Enterprises [(2005) 8 SCC 308], this Court, while considering similar provisions of a subsequent notification NO.1/93-CE, in paragraph 6, observed as under: - \023The notification clearly indicates that the assessee will be debarred only if it uses on the goods in respect of which exemption is sought, the same/similar brand name with the intention of indicating a connecti…