M/S I2 TECHNOLGOIES SOFTWARE PVT LTD,BANGALORE vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)IV, BANGALORE
In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purpose
ITA 1208/BANG/2014[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore23 Mar 2018AY 2005-06
Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Yadav & Shri Jason P. Boazit(Tp)A No.1208/Bang/2014 Assessment Year : 2005-06 M/S. Jda Software Private Vs. Additional Commissioner Of Limited Income Tax, (‘Erstwhile I2 Technologies India Range 11, Pvt. Ltd.,) Bengaluru. Tower A, Mantri Commercio, Near Sakra World Hospital, Outer Ring Road, Bellandur, Bengaluru-560103. Pan : Aaaci7334Q Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri. Arvind V. Sonde, Advocate Revenue By : Shri. C. H. Sundar Rao, Cit-Dr-I Date Of Hearing : 22.02.2018 Date Of Pronouncement : 23.02.2018
For Appellant: Shri. Arvind V. Sonde, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. C. H. Sundar Rao, CIT-DR-I
Section 10Section 133(6)Section 92C
…Therefore, it cannot be considered as a comparable in the light of the following decisions of the Co-ordinate Benches; 1. Genesis Integrating Systems (India) (P) Ltd., v. Dy. CIT [2012] 53 SOT 159/20 taxmann.com 715 2. Google India (P) Ltd., V. Dy. CIT [2013] 55 SOT 489/29 taxmann.com 412 (Bang – Trib.) 3. CRM Services India (P) Ltd. case (supra) 4. Fiat India (P) Ltd., v. ACIT 2010-TII-30-ITAT-Mum-TP 5. Global Turbine services Inc. V. DDIT (International Taxation) [2013] 38 taxmann.com 220 (Delhi – Trib.) 6. Dy. CIT V. Panasonic AVC Networks India Co. Ltd. [2014] 63 SOT 121 (URO)/42 taxmann.com 420 (Delhi – Trib…