Co-ordinate Benches; 1. Genesis Integrating Systems (India) (P) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT

55 SOT 489Income Tax Appellate Tribunal2013#14337 most cited
7

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2016 to 2022.

Judgments citing Co-ordinate Benches; 1. Genesis Integrating Systems (India) (P) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT

M/S. SCHUTZ DISHMAN BIOTECH PVT.LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY.CIT, CIRCLE-8,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the Revenue’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 1947/AHD/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad01 Jan 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms. Madhumita Roy1. आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1909/Ahd/2015 2. आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1947/Ahd/2015 ("नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year : 2010-11) 1.The Dcit 1. Schutz Disman बनाम/ Circe-8, Ahmedabad Biotech Ltd. Vs. Ahmedabad 2. Schutz Dishman Biotech 2. The Dcit Ltd. Circle-8 Bhadraraj Chambers Ahmedabad Nr.Swastik Cross Road Navrangpura, Ahmedabad "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaccs 0988C .. (अपीलाथ"/Appellants) (""यथ" / Respondents) Assessee By : Shri Tushar Hemani & Shri Parimal Parmar, Ar Revenue By : Shri Vinod Jalwani, Sr.Dr

For Appellant: Shri Tushar Hemani &For Respondent: Shri Vinod Jalwani, Sr.DR
Section 115JSection 36(1)(va)Section 41

…to be excluded from the comparison as the same would give distorted picture of ALP comparison. Reliance is placed on: - PCIT vs. Barclays Technology Centre India (P.) Ltd. – (23018) 95 taxmann.com 170 (Bom) (Annexure “F”). - Google India (P.) Ltd. vs. DCIT – 55 SOT 489 (Bang) (Annexure “D”). ITA No.1947/Ahd/2015(by Assessee) & Schutz Dishman Biotech Ltd. vs. DCIT Asst.Year - 2010-11 46. On the other hand, the Ld. DR relied on the order of the authorities below. 47. We have heard the rival contentions and perused the materials available on record. In the instant case, the issue relates to the selection of comp…

THE DCIT, CIRCLE-8,, AHMEDABAD vs. SCHUTZ DISHMAN BIOTECH LTD.,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the Revenue’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 1909/AHD/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad01 Jan 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms. Madhumita Roy1. आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1909/Ahd/2015 2. आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1947/Ahd/2015 ("नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year : 2010-11) 1.The Dcit 1. Schutz Disman बनाम/ Circe-8, Ahmedabad Biotech Ltd. Vs. Ahmedabad 2. Schutz Dishman Biotech 2. The Dcit Ltd. Circle-8 Bhadraraj Chambers Ahmedabad Nr.Swastik Cross Road Navrangpura, Ahmedabad "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaccs 0988C .. (अपीलाथ"/Appellants) (""यथ" / Respondents) Assessee By : Shri Tushar Hemani & Shri Parimal Parmar, Ar Revenue By : Shri Vinod Jalwani, Sr.Dr

For Appellant: Shri Tushar Hemani &For Respondent: Shri Vinod Jalwani, Sr.DR
Section 115JSection 36(1)(va)Section 41

…to be excluded from the comparison as the same would give distorted picture of ALP comparison. Reliance is placed on: - PCIT vs. Barclays Technology Centre India (P.) Ltd. – (23018) 95 taxmann.com 170 (Bom) (Annexure “F”). - Google India (P.) Ltd. vs. DCIT – 55 SOT 489 (Bang) (Annexure “D”). ITA No.1947/Ahd/2015(by Assessee) & Schutz Dishman Biotech Ltd. vs. DCIT Asst.Year - 2010-11 46. On the other hand, the Ld. DR relied on the order of the authorities below. 47. We have heard the rival contentions and perused the materials available on record. In the instant case, the issue relates to the selection of comp…

M/S I2 TECHNOLGOIES SOFTWARE PVT LTD,BANGALORE vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)IV, BANGALORE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 1208/BANG/2014[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore23 Mar 2018AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Yadav & Shri Jason P. Boazit(Tp)A No.1208/Bang/2014 Assessment Year : 2005-06 M/S. Jda Software Private Vs. Additional Commissioner Of Limited Income Tax, (‘Erstwhile I2 Technologies India Range 11, Pvt. Ltd.,) Bengaluru. Tower A, Mantri Commercio, Near Sakra World Hospital, Outer Ring Road, Bellandur, Bengaluru-560103. Pan : Aaaci7334Q Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri. Arvind V. Sonde, Advocate Revenue By : Shri. C. H. Sundar Rao, Cit-Dr-I Date Of Hearing : 22.02.2018 Date Of Pronouncement : 23.02.2018

For Appellant: Shri. Arvind V. Sonde, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. C. H. Sundar Rao, CIT-DR-I
Section 10Section 133(6)Section 92C

…Therefore, it cannot be considered as a comparable in the light of the following decisions of the Co-ordinate Benches; 1. Genesis Integrating Systems (India) (P) Ltd., v. Dy. CIT [2012] 53 SOT 159/20 taxmann.com 715 2. Google India (P) Ltd., V. Dy. CIT [2013] 55 SOT 489/29 taxmann.com 412 (Bang – Trib.) 3. CRM Services India (P) Ltd. case (supra) 4. Fiat India (P) Ltd., v. ACIT 2010-TII-30-ITAT-Mum-TP 5. Global Turbine services Inc. V. DDIT (International Taxation) [2013] 38 taxmann.com 220 (Delhi – Trib.) 6. Dy. CIT V. Panasonic AVC Networks India Co. Ltd. [2014] 63 SOT 121 (URO)/42 taxmann.com 420 (Delhi – Trib…

Co-ordinate Benches; 1. Genesis Integrating Systems (India) (P) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (55 SOT 489) — Cited in 7 Judgments | BharatTax