CIT vs. Shelly Products (2003) 261 ITR 367 (SC), S. R. Koshti v. CIT

185 Taxmann 266High Court2009#8274 most cited
13

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2019 to 2024.

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT vs. Shelly Products (2003) 261 ITR 367 (SC), S. R. Koshti v. CIT

AURA SECURITIES PVT. LTD.,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO, WARD-1(1)(1), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 532/AHD/2020[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad15 Jul 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap, Vice- & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyalassessment Year : 2017-18 Aura Securities Private Limited, Income Tax Officer, 403, 404 Shilp Building, Vs Circle-1(1)(1), Cg Road, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad Ahmedabad – 380009 Pan : Aabcm 0602 L अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Biren Shah & Shri Dhrunal Bhatt, Ars Revenue By : Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Sr. Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 16/06/2022 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement: 15/07/2022 आदेश/O R D E R Per P.M. Jagtap, Vice-: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of Learned Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeals)-1, Ahmedabad (“Cit(A)” In Short) Dated 21.09.2020 & The Solitary Ground Raised Therein Reads As Under:-

For Appellant: Shri Biren Shah & Shri Dhrunal Bhatt, ARsFor Respondent: Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Sr. DR
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 14A

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, अहमदाबाद "यायपीठ आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण अहमदाबाद "यायपीठ ‘बी’ अहमदाबाद। अहमदाबाद। आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण अहमदाबाद "यायपीठ अहमदाबाद "यायपीठ अहमदाबाद। अहमदाबाद। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B” BENCH, AHMEDABAD BEFORE SHRI P.M. JAGTAP, VICE-PRESIDENT AND SHRI SIDDHARTHA NAUTIYAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year : 2017-18 Aura Securities Private Limited, Income Tax Officer, 403, 404 Shilp Building, Vs Circle-1(1)(1), CG Road, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad Ahmedabad – 380009 PAN : AABCM 0602 L अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri Biren Shah & Shri Dhrunal Bhatt…

SHRI ASHOK DHARENDRA,JAIPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 256/JPR/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur12 Apr 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain, Jm & Shri Rathod Kamlesh Jayantbhai, Am Vk;Dj Vihy La-@Ita No. 256/Jp/2018 Fu/Kzkj.K O"Kz@Assessment Year :2015-16 Shri Ashok Dharendra, Cuke D.C.I.T. 23, Shivraj Niketan Scheme, Vs. Central Circle-3, Gautam Marg, Nr Vaishali Jaipur. Nagar Circle, Jaipur. Lfkk;H Ys[Kk La-@Thvkbzvkj La-@Pan/Gir No.: Aavpd 6554 B Vihykfkhz@Appellant Izr;Fkhz@Respondent Fu/Kzkfjrh Dh Vksj Ls@ Assessee By : Shri Manish Agarwal (Ca) Jktlo Dh Vksj Ls@ Revenue By : Shri S. Najmi (Cit-Dr) Lquokbz Dh Rkjh[K@ Date Of Hearing : 02/02/2022 Mn?Kks"K.Kk Dh Rkjh[K@ Date Of Pronouncement : 12 /04/2022 Vkns'K@ Order Per: Sandeep Gosain, J.M. This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of Ld. Cit(A)- 4, Jaipur Dated 01/12/2017 For The A.Y. 2015-16 In The Matter Of Order Passed U/S 143(3) Read With Section 153B(1)(B) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (In Short, The Act), Wherein Following Grounds Have Been Taken. “1. On The Facts & In The Circumstances Of The Case The Ld. Cit(A) Has Grossly Erred In Confirming The Addition Of Rs. 1,50,00,000/- Made In The Assessment Completed U/S 143(3) R.W.S. 153B(1)(B) Solely On The Basis Of Statements Recorded During The Course Of Search Which Stood Retracted By The Assessee Through An Affidavit Filed. Thus, The Addition Made Solely On The Basis Of Such Retracted Statements Deserves To Be Deleted.

For Appellant: Shri Manish Agarwal (CA)For Respondent: Shri S. Najmi (CIT-DR)
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153B(1)(b)Section 3

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर न्यायपीठ] जयपुर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES “A”, JAIPUR Jh lanhi x®lkÃa] U;kf;d lnL; ,oa Jh jkBkSM+ deys'k t;arHkkbZ] ys[kk lnL; ds le{k BEFORE SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 256/JP/2018 fu/kZkj.k o"kZ@Assessment Year :2015-16 Shri Ashok Dharendra, cuke D.C.I.T. 23, Shivraj Niketan Scheme, Vs. Central Circle-3, Gautam Marg, NR Vaishali Jaipur. Nagar Circle, Jaipur. LFkk;h ys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.: AAVPD 6554 B vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@ Assessee by : Shri Manish Ag…

ARDOR IN-FIN PVT. LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(3),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1121/AHD/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad26 May 2020AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 1121/Ahd/2015 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2011-12 Ardor-In-Fin P Ltd Ito, Ward-7(3) Ardor House, Vs Ahmedabad. Mondeal Business Park B/S.Gurudwara Thalej, S.G. Road Ahmedabad 380 059. Pan : Aagca 2925 B अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Ankit Talsania Revenue By : Shri Lalit P.Jain, Sr.Dr

For Appellant: Shri Ankit TalsaniaFor Respondent: Shri Lalit P.Jain, Sr.DR
Section 143(2)Section 14A

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, अहमदाबाद "यायपीठ - अहमदाबाद । IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD – BENCH ‘SMC’ [Conducted Through Virtual Court] BEFORE SHRI RAJPAL YADAV, VICE-PRESIDENT आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 1121/Ahd/2015 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2011-12 Ardor-In-Fin P Ltd ITO, Ward-7(3) Ardor House, Vs Ahmedabad. Mondeal Business Park B/s.Gurudwara Thalej, S.G. Road Ahmedabad 380 059. PAN : AAGCA 2925 B अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri Ankit Talsania Revenue by : Shri Lalit P.Jain, Sr.DR सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date of Hearing : 22/05/2020 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date of Pronouncement : 2705/…

CIT vs. Shelly Products (2003) 261 ITR 367 (SC), S. R. Koshti v. CIT (185 Taxmann 266) — Cited in 13 Judgments | BharatTax