CIT v. Yahoo India (P) Ltd.

33 Taxmann.com 332High Court2013#10228 most cited
11

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2026.

Judgments citing CIT v. Yahoo India (P) Ltd.

CAPGEMINI TECHNOLOGY SERVICES INDIA LIMITED (SUCCESSOR TO LIQUIDHUB INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED),PUNE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 1(1), PUNE, PUNE

In the result, the Appeal filed by the Assessee is allowed

ITA 2753/PUN/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Pune19 Jan 2026AY 2020-21

Bench: Dr.Dipak P. Ripote & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपऩल सं. / Ita No.2753/Pun/2025 निर्धारण वषा / Assessment Year: 2020-21 Capgemini Technology V Assessment Unit, Services India S Income Tax Limited(Successor To Liquid Department. Hub India Private Limited), Plot No.14, Rajiv Gandhi Infotech Park, Hinjewadi, Phase Iii, Midc Sez, Village Man, Taluka Mulshi, District Pune – 411057. Pan: Aaacl8943J Appellant/ Assessee Respondent /Revenue Assessee By Shri Sudin Sabnis & Shri Siddhesh Khandalkar Revenue By Shri Madhukar Anand-Jcit(Through Virtual) Date Of Hearing 05/01/2026 Date Of Pronouncement 19/01/2026 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of Ld.Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeal)[Nfac], Passed Under Section 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 For The A.Y.2020-21 Dated 02.09.2025 Emanating From The Penalty Order Passed Under Section

Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 155Section 155(18)Section 18Section 250Section 270ASection 270A(6)(a)Section 40

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण ”एस एम सी” न्यायपीठ पुणेमें। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PUNE BENCHES “SMC” :: PUNE BEFORE DR.DIPAK P. RIPOTE, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI VINAY BHAMORE, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकर अपऩल सं. / ITA No.2753/PUN/2025 निर्धारण वषा / Assessment Year: 2020-21 Capgemini Technology V Assessment Unit, Services India s Income Tax Limited(Successor to Liquid Department. Hub India Private Limited), Plot No.14, Rajiv Gandhi Infotech Park, Hinjewadi, Phase III, MIDC SEZ, Village Man, Taluka Mulshi, District Pune – 411057. PAN: AAACL8943J Appellant/ Assessee Respondent /Revenue Assessee by Shri Sudin Sabnis…

THE DCIT (EXEMPTIONS), CIRCLE-2,, AHMEDABAD vs. BARODA CRICKET ASSOCIATION,, VADODARA

In the result, all the three appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 999/AHD/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad21 May 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Mahavir Prasad1. आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.999/Ahd/2017 2. आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.1000/Ahd/2017 3. आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.1001/Ahd/2017 (Assessment Years : 2009-10, 2010-11 & 2011-12 Respectively)

For Appellant: Ms.Aparna M.Agarwal, CIT-DRFor Respondent: Shri Nirmit Mehta, AR
Section 11Section 13(8)Section 2(15)Section 271(1)(c)

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, अहमदाबाद "यायपीठ ‘सी’, अहमदाबाद । IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “ C ” BENCH, AHMEDABAD सव"ी "द"प कुमार के"डया, लेखा सद"य एवं महावीर "साद, "या"यक सद"य के सम" । BEFORE SHRI PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & SHRI MAHAVIR PRASAD, JUDICIAL MEMBER 1. आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.999/Ahd/2017 2. आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.1000/Ahd/2017 3. आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.1001/Ahd/2017 (Assessment Years : 2009-10, 2010-11 & 2011-12 respectively) The DCIT (Exemptions) Baroda Cricket Association बनाम/ Circle-2 BCA House Vs. Ahmedabad 78, Hari Bhakti Extension Race Course Vadodara – 390 007 "थायी लेखा सं./जी…

THE DCIT (EXEMPTIONS), CIRCLE-2,, AHMEDABAD vs. BARODA CRICKET ASSOCIATION,, VADODARA

In the result, all the three appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 1001/AHD/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad21 May 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Mahavir Prasad1. आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.999/Ahd/2017 2. आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.1000/Ahd/2017 3. आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.1001/Ahd/2017 (Assessment Years : 2009-10, 2010-11 & 2011-12 Respectively)

For Appellant: Ms.Aparna M.Agarwal, CIT-DRFor Respondent: Shri Nirmit Mehta, AR
Section 11Section 13(8)Section 2(15)Section 271(1)(c)

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, अहमदाबाद "यायपीठ ‘सी’, अहमदाबाद । IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “ C ” BENCH, AHMEDABAD सव"ी "द"प कुमार के"डया, लेखा सद"य एवं महावीर "साद, "या"यक सद"य के सम" । BEFORE SHRI PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & SHRI MAHAVIR PRASAD, JUDICIAL MEMBER 1. आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.999/Ahd/2017 2. आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.1000/Ahd/2017 3. आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.1001/Ahd/2017 (Assessment Years : 2009-10, 2010-11 & 2011-12 respectively) The DCIT (Exemptions) Baroda Cricket Association बनाम/ Circle-2 BCA House Vs. Ahmedabad 78, Hari Bhakti Extension Race Course Vadodara – 390 007 "थायी लेखा सं./जी…

THE DCIT (EXEMPTIONS), CIRCLE-2,, AHMEDABAD vs. BARODA CRICKET ASSOCIATION,, VADODARA

In the result, all the three appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 1000/AHD/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad21 May 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Mahavir Prasad1. आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.999/Ahd/2017 2. आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.1000/Ahd/2017 3. आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.1001/Ahd/2017 (Assessment Years : 2009-10, 2010-11 & 2011-12 Respectively)

For Appellant: Ms.Aparna M.Agarwal, CIT-DRFor Respondent: Shri Nirmit Mehta, AR
Section 11Section 13(8)Section 2(15)Section 271(1)(c)

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, अहमदाबाद "यायपीठ ‘सी’, अहमदाबाद । IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “ C ” BENCH, AHMEDABAD सव"ी "द"प कुमार के"डया, लेखा सद"य एवं महावीर "साद, "या"यक सद"य के सम" । BEFORE SHRI PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & SHRI MAHAVIR PRASAD, JUDICIAL MEMBER 1. आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.999/Ahd/2017 2. आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.1000/Ahd/2017 3. आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.1001/Ahd/2017 (Assessment Years : 2009-10, 2010-11 & 2011-12 respectively) The DCIT (Exemptions) Baroda Cricket Association बनाम/ Circle-2 BCA House Vs. Ahmedabad 78, Hari Bhakti Extension Race Course Vadodara – 390 007 "थायी लेखा सं./जी…

ADVANCE CONSTRUCTION CO. P.LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT 8(1), MUMBAI

In the result, Ground No.2 is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 999/MUM/2012[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai09 May 2018AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri B.R. Baskaran & Shri Pawan Singhm/S Advance Construction Co. P. Dcit-8(1) Ltd. “Kavita” Plot No. 37, 2Nd Aayakar Bhavan, Churchgate, Floor, Vithal Nagar Co-Op. Vs. Mumbai-20. Housing Soc. 11Th Road, Jvpd Scheme, Mumbai -400049. Pan: Aabca0710B Appellant Respondent M/S Advance Construction Co. P. Dcit-8(1) Ltd. “Kavita” Plot No. 37, 2Nd Aayakar Bhavan, Churchgate, Floor, Vithal Nagar Co-Op. Vs. Mumbai-20. Housing Soc. 11Th Road, Jvpd Scheme, Mumbai -400049. Pan: Aabca0710B Appellant Respondent Appellant By : Shri Nirmit Mehta (Ar) Respondent By : Shri Virender Singh (Sr-Dr) Date Of Hearing : 09.05.2018 Date Of Pronouncement : 09.05.2018 Order Under Section 254(1) Of Income–Tax Act Per Pawan Singh; 1. These Two Appeals By Assessee Under Section 253 Of The Income-Tax Act

For Appellant: Shri Nirmit Mehta (AR)For Respondent: Shri Virender Singh (Sr-DR)
Section 143(3)Section 253Section 254(1)Section 271(1)(c)Section 80I

…IN THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI B.R. BASKARAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER M/s Advance Construction Co. P. DCIT-8(1) Ltd. “Kavita” Plot No. 37, 2nd Aayakar Bhavan, Churchgate, Floor, Vithal Nagar Co-op. Vs. Mumbai-20. Housing Soc. 11th Road, JVPD Scheme, Mumbai -400049. PAN: AABCA0710B Appellant Respondent M/s Advance Construction Co. P. DCIT-8(1) Ltd. “Kavita” Plot No. 37, 2nd Aayakar Bhavan, Churchgate, Floor, Vithal Nagar Co-op. Vs. Mumbai-20. Housing Soc. 11th Road, JVPD Scheme, Mumbai -400049. PAN: AABCA0710B Appellant Respondent Appellant by :…