CIT v. Warner Hindustan Ltd.

117 ITR 15High Court1979#14778 most cited
6

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2018 to 2025.

Judgments citing CIT v. Warner Hindustan Ltd.

RAJA SATHEESHKUMAR,SALEM vs. ITO, WARD-1(6), SALEM

The appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2942/CHNY/2025[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai17 Dec 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri George George K & Before Hon’Ble Shri Inturi Rama Raoआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2942/Chny/2025 Assessment Years: 2011-12 Raja Satheeshkumar, Income Tax Officer, H.No.2/167, Cecg Nagar, Alagapuram, Ward-1(6), Periyapudur, Salem, Salem. Tamil Nadu-636 016. [Pan: Auqps9210G] (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) अपीलार्थी की ओर से/ Assessee By : Mr.Bhupendran S, Advocate प्रत्यर्थी की ओर से /Revenue By : Ms.R.Anitha, Addl.Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 16.12.2025 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 17.12.2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per Inturi Rama Rao, A.M :

For Appellant: Mr.Bhupendran S, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms.R.Anitha, Addl.CIT
Section 139(1)Section 142(1)Section 143Section 143(3)Section 148Section 246Section 246A

…ent within the meaning of section 143 or section 144 of the Act and an appeal lies under section 246(c) against such an order….” Similar view is taken by the Hon’ble High Court of Andra Pradesh in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax Vs Warner Hindustan Ltd 117 ITR 15 Hon’ble Madras High Court in the case of CIT Vs Sundaram Industries Ltd (1999) Tax LR 506, 507(Mad). Thus, the law is well settled to the extent that an order passed by the assessing officer giving effect to the directions of appellate authority is clearly appealable. In view of this well settled position of the law, the reasoning adopted by the l…

CIT v. Warner Hindustan Ltd. (117 ITR 15) — Cited in 6 Judgments | BharatTax