CIT v. Vijay Vargiya Vani Charitable Trust

369 ITR 360High Court2014#6168 most cited

What is CIT v. Vijay Vargiya Vani Charitable Trust authority for?

The registration proceeding for a charitable trust and the assessment proceeding are distinct and separate; the Commissioner (Exemption) can only consider the objects of the trust when granting registration, not issues relevant to assessment.

19

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2012 to 2025.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Vijay Vargiya Vani Charitable Trust · section 12AA · registration proceeding · assessment proceeding · Commissioner (Exemption) · objects of trust

Also reported as

58 Taxmann.com 335232 Taxmann 340

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT v. Vijay Vargiya Vani Charitable Trust

ACIT, CIRCLE- 26(2), NEW DELHI vs. VODAFONE IDEA LTD. (EARLIER KNWON AS VODAFONE MOBILE SERVICES LTD.), NEW DELHI

ITA 8079/DEL/2018[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi21 Mar 2025AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmanassessment Year: 1999-2000 Vs. M/S. Vodafone West Ltd. Acit, Circle-26(2), (Thereafter Merged With New Delhi Vodafone Mobile Services Ltd.), C-48, Okhla Industrial Area, Phase-2, New Delhi Pan: Aaacf1190P (Appellant) (Respondent) With Assessment Year: 2007-08 Vs. M/S. Vodafone Idea Ltd. Acit, Circle-26(2), (Earlier Known As Vodafone New Delhi Mobile Services Ltd.), C-48, Okhla Industrial Area, Phase-2, New Delhi Pan: Aaacb2100P (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By Sh. Salil Kapoor, Adv. Sh. Anil Chachra, Adv. Ms. Ananya Kapoor, Adv. Department By Sh. Vijay B. Basanta, Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing 06.03.2025 Date Of Pronouncement 21.03.2025 Order Per Satbeer Singh Godara, Jm These Revenue’S Appeals Ita No.7658/Del/2018 & 8079/Del/2018 For Assessment Years 1999-2000 & 2007-08

Section 271(1)(c)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCH: ‘D’ NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year: 1999-2000 Vs. M/s. Vodafone West Ltd. ACIT, Circle-26(2), (thereafter merged with New Delhi Vodafone Mobile Services Ltd.), C-48, Okhla Industrial Area, Phase-2, New Delhi PAN: AAACF1190P (Appellant) (Respondent) With Assessment Year: 2007-08 Vs. M/s. Vodafone Idea Ltd. ACIT, Circle-26(2), (earlier known as Vodafone New Delhi Mobile Services Ltd.), C-48, Okhla Industrial Area, Phase-2, New Delhi PAN: AAACB2100P (Appellant) (Respondent) Ass…

ACIT, CIRCLE-26(2), NEW DELHI vs. VODAFONE WEST LTD., (THEREAFTER MERGED WITH VODAFONE MOBILE SERVICES LTD.),, NEW DELHI

ITA 7658/DEL/2018[1999-2000]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi21 Mar 2025AY 1999-2000

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmanassessment Year: 1999-2000 Vs. M/S. Vodafone West Ltd. Acit, Circle-26(2), (Thereafter Merged With New Delhi Vodafone Mobile Services Ltd.), C-48, Okhla Industrial Area, Phase-2, New Delhi Pan: Aaacf1190P (Appellant) (Respondent) With Assessment Year: 2007-08 Vs. M/S. Vodafone Idea Ltd. Acit, Circle-26(2), (Earlier Known As Vodafone New Delhi Mobile Services Ltd.), C-48, Okhla Industrial Area, Phase-2, New Delhi Pan: Aaacb2100P (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By Sh. Salil Kapoor, Adv. Sh. Anil Chachra, Adv. Ms. Ananya Kapoor, Adv. Department By Sh. Vijay B. Basanta, Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing 06.03.2025 Date Of Pronouncement 21.03.2025 Order Per Satbeer Singh Godara, Jm These Revenue’S Appeals Ita No.7658/Del/2018 & 8079/Del/2018 For Assessment Years 1999-2000 & 2007-08

Section 271(1)(c)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCH: ‘D’ NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year: 1999-2000 Vs. M/s. Vodafone West Ltd. ACIT, Circle-26(2), (thereafter merged with New Delhi Vodafone Mobile Services Ltd.), C-48, Okhla Industrial Area, Phase-2, New Delhi PAN: AAACF1190P (Appellant) (Respondent) With Assessment Year: 2007-08 Vs. M/s. Vodafone Idea Ltd. ACIT, Circle-26(2), (earlier known as Vodafone New Delhi Mobile Services Ltd.), C-48, Okhla Industrial Area, Phase-2, New Delhi PAN: AAACB2100P (Appellant) (Respondent) Ass…

EDEN EDUCATION AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE ,AURANGABAD vs. CIT, EXEMPTION, , PUNE

In the result, the appeal of the Assessee stands Allowed

ITA 201/PUN/2021[-]Status: DisposedITAT Pune15 Mar 2022

Bench: Shri S.S.Viswanethra Ravi & Shri Dr. Dipak P. Ripoteआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.201/Pun/2021 Eden Education & Research The Cit, Exemption, Institute, Vs Pune. Shop No.3, G.No.140, Delux Bazar, Satara, Aurangabad – 431001. Pan : Aaate 7724 P Appellant/ Revenue Respondent/ Assessee Assessee By Shri Kishor Phadke – Ar Revenue By Shri Naveen Gupta - Dr Date Of Hearing 15/02/2022 Date Of Pronouncement 15/03/2022 आदेश / Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order U/S 12Aa(1)(B)(Ii) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘The Act’) Passed By The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemption), Pune On 30.03.2021. 2) The Grounds Of Appeal Raised By Assessee Are As Under : “1. The Learned Cit, Exemption, Pune; Erred In Law & On Facts In Not Granting Registration U/S 12A Of The Ita, 1961 To Appellant Trust. 2. Appellant Contends That, Appellant Made Detailed Submissions Upon All The Issues Raised, Whereas, The Learned Cit, Exemption, Pune; Declined The Registration U/S 12A Of The Ita, 1961 On Altogether Erroneous & Incorrect Analogies Without Affording Any Further Opportunity To Appellant, To Make A Say In The Matter & As Such, Vitiated Principle Of Natural Justice. 3. The Learned Cit, Exemption, Pune Erred In Law & On Facts In Making Following Erroneous & Fallacious Observations: Eden Education & Research Institute (A)

Section 12ASection 131

…ion of the trust. AR relied on the decision in the case of Shree Balaji Educational Trust 88 taxmann.com 358 (Delhi Trib), Pr.CIT v/s Shri Nathji Giverdhan Nathji Charitable Trust 423 ITR 69(Calcutta) dt.28/02/2020, CIT v/s Vijay Vargiya vani Charitable Trust 369 ITR 360 (Rajasthan) dated 18/08/2014.The AR further submitted that the objects of the trust are charitable and the Commissioner has not disputed this fact. 6. The Ld.DR relied on the order of the ld.Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption). The ld.CIT(DR) specifically submitted that there are two situations during the registration procedure u/s 12AA. In o…

SHREE ALIBAG KUTCHI VISA OSWAL JAIN SANGH ,RAIGAD vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX EXEMPTION, PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 624/PUN/2020[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Jul 2021AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.624/Pun/2020 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2020-21 Shree Alibag Kutchi Visa Oswal Jain Sangh, Plot No.12, Alibaug Jain Sangh, Behind Prathamic School, Chendhare Shreebag Road, Alibag, Raigad – 402201. .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant Pan : Aaets3070L बनाम / V/S. Cit (Exemptions), ……""यथ" / Respondent Pune. Assessee By : None Revenue By : Shri Deepak Garg सुनवाई क" तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 24.06.2021 घोषणा क" तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 26.07.2021 आदेश / Order Per Inturi Rama Rao, Am: This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemption), Pune [‘The Cit (Exemption)]’ For Short) U/S 12Aa(1)(B)(Ii) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘The Act’) Dated 30.09.2020 Denying The Grant Of Registration U/S 12Aa Of The Act. 2. The Appellant Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal :- “1. On The Facts & In The Circumstances Of The Case The Ld. Cit(E) Has Erred In Holding That Registration U/S 12Aa Cannot Be Granted Unless Tax Is Paid On The Income Assessed At The Time Of 12Aa Proceedings. 2. On The Facts & In The Circumstances Of The Case The Ld. Cit(E) Has Erred In Making Incorrect Assessment Of Income Of The Trust Without Following The Law & Established Judicial Precedents. 3. On The Facts & In The Circumstances Of The Case The Ld. Cit(E) Has Erred In Exceeding The Jurisdiction Bestowed Upon The Ld. Cit(E) In As Much As The Ld. Cit(E) Has Sought Details Of Sources Of Income Of The Trust Whereas The Ld. Cit(E) Is To Merely Look Into The Application Of Such Income.

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Deepak Garg
Section 12A

…i) M. Visvesvaraya Industrial Research And Development Centre vs. ITAT, 251 ITR 852; (iv) New Life in Christ Evangelistic Association vs. CIT, 246 ITR 532; (v) N.N. Desai Charitable Trust vs. CIT, 246 ITR 452; and, CIT vs. Vijay Vargiya Vani Charitable Trust, 369 ITR 360. (vi) 8. To the same effect, the decisions of the Hon’ble M. P. High Court in the case of CIT vs. D.P.R. Charitable Trust, 61 DTR 410 (MP) and CIT vs. Divine Shiksha Samiti, 428 ITR 552 (MP) and the decision of the Hon’ble Jurisdictional High Court in the case of CIT vs. Manekji Mota Charitable Trust, 267 taxman 16 and even recently the Hon’ble M…

PRAMOD KIRAN SEVADHAM FOUNDATION,AHMEDNAGAR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, EXEMPTION, PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 601/PUN/2020[2019-2020]Status: DisposedITAT Pune01 Jun 2021AY 2019-2020

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.601/Pun/2020 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2019-20 Pramod Kiran Sevadham Foundation, 35, Varad Estate, Near Swami Samarth Mandir, Gaikwad Colony Savedi Road, Ahmednagar-414003. .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant Pan : Aactp6537B बनाम / V/S. Cit, Exemption, ……""यथ" / Respondent Pune. Assessee By : Shri Prasad Bhandari Revenue By : Shri Deepak Garg सुनवाई क" तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 01.06.2021 घोषणा क" तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 01.06.2021 आदेश / Order Per Inturi Rama Rao, Am: This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Society Directed Against The Order Of The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax, Exemption, Pune (‘Cit, Exemption’ For Short) Dated 29.09.2020 Denying The Grant Of Registration U/S 12Aa Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘The Act’). 2. The Appellant Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal :- “1. On The Facts & In The Prevailing Circumstances Of The Case, The Learned Cit (Exemption) - Pune Erred In Rejecting The Claim Of The Assessee For Granting Registration Under Section 12Aa Of The Act Without Appreciating The Submission Made By The Assessee Along With The Documentary Proofs Of All The Activities Carried Out By The Trust. 2. On The Facts & In The Prevailing Circumstances Of The Case, The Learned Cit (Exemption) - Pune Erred In Rejecting The Claim Of The Assessee For Granting Registration Under Section 12Aa Without Giving An Opportunity Of Being Heard.

For Appellant: Shri Prasad BhandariFor Respondent: Shri Deepak Garg
Section 12A

…i) M. Visvesvaraya Industrial Research And Development Centre vs. ITAT, 251 ITR 852; (iv) New Life in Christ Evangelistic Association vs. CIT, 246 ITR 532; (v) N.N. Desai Charitable Trust vs. CIT, 246 ITR 452; and, CIT vs. Vijay Vargiya Vani Charitable Trust, 369 ITR 360. (vi) 9. From the perusal of the impugned order, it is clear that the ld. CIT, Exemption had denied the grant of registration by taking into consideration that the corpus donations collected in the preceding financial years had escaped assessment to tax which clearly falls under the realm of the assessment. In view of the settled position of law…

ASSOCIATION OF ASESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGEONS,THANE vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (EXEMPTIONS ), PUNE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 526/PUN/2020[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Pune24 Mar 2021AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.526/Pun/2020 Association Of Asesthetic Plastic Surgeons, Add: C/O Medha Bhave, 101, Shah’S Capital, Ghantali Devi Road, Naupada, Thane West-400602. .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant Pan : Aagta5573J बनाम / V/S. Cit (Exemptions), ……""यथ" / Respondent Pune. Assessee By : Shri Rohan Dedhia Revenue By : Shri Deepak Garg सुनवाई क" तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 23.03.2021 घोषणा क" तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 24.03.2021 आदेश / Order Per Inturi Rama Rao, Am: This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Society Directed Against The Order Of The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemption), Pune Dated 13.08.2020 Denying The Registration U/S 12Aa Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (“The Act” For Short). 2. The Appellant Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal :- “1. On The Facts & In The Circumstances Of The Case, The Ld. Cit(E) Has Erred In Holding That The Activities Of Trust Are Not Charitable In Nature & Thereby Refusing To Grant Registration U/S 12Aa, Whereas In Fact The Activities Of The Trust Are Charitable In Nature & Trust Is Eligible For Registration U/S 12Aa. 2. The Appellant Craves Leave To Add, Alter, Amend, Delete And/Or Vary The Above Grounds Of Appeal/Relief Claimed At Any Time Before The Decision Of The Appeal.”

For Appellant: Shri Rohan DedhiaFor Respondent: Shri Deepak Garg
Section 12A

…Visvesvaraya Industrial Research And Development Centre vs. ITAT, 251 ITR 852; (iv) New Life in Christ Evangelistic Association vs. CIT, 246 ITR 532; (v) N.N. Desai Charitable Trust vs. CIT, 246 ITR 452; and, (vi) CIT vs. Vijay Vargiya Vani Charitable Trust, 369 ITR 360. 11. From the perusal of the impugned order, it is crystal clear that the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax, Exemption, Pune had lost sight distinction between the process of registration and the exemption or assessment of income u/s 11 of the Act. Therefore, the reasoning given by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax, Exemption, Pune cannot be sustai…

MANCAN FOUNDATION,UDAIPUR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), JAIPUR

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1092/JPR/2019[0]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur29 Jan 2021

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain, Jm & Shri Vikram Singh Yadav, Am Vk;Dj Vihy La-@Ita No. 1092/Jp/2019 Fu/Kzkj.K O"Kz@Assessment Year :.................. Cuke Mancan Foundation, C.I.T.(Exemption) Vs. Udaipur. Jaipur. C/O-Shah Patni & Co. Chartered Accountants, S.B. One, Babu Nagar, Jln Marg, Jaipur- 302015. Lfkk;H Ys[Kk La-@Thvkbzvkj La-@Pan/Gir No.: Aaftm 7600 K Vihykfkhz@Appellant Izr;Fkhz@Respondent Fu/Kzkfjrh Dh Vksj Ls@ Assessee By: Shri Pramod Patni (Ca) Jktlo Dh Vksj Ls@ Revenue By : Shri Ambrish Bedi (Cit-Dr) Lquokbz Dh Rkjh[K@ Date Of Hearing : 12/01/2021 Mn?Kks"K.Kk Dh Rkjh[K@ Date Of Pronouncement : 29/01/2021 Vkns'K@ Order Per: Sandeep Gosain, J.M. The Present Appeal Has Been Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemption), Jaipur (In Short, The Cit(E)) Dated 27/06/2019 Passed U/S 12Aa(1)(B)(Ii) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (In Short, The Act). In This Appeal, The Assessee Has Taken Following Grounds: “1. The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax Has Grossly Erred In Fact As Well As In Law In Rejection The Application For Registration U/S. 12Aa Of Income Tax Act, 1961 Of The Appellant Company:

For Appellant: Shri Pramod Patni (CA)For Respondent: Shri Ambrish Bedi (CIT-DR)
Section 12ASection 2(15)

…Decisions relied in support of this contention are: i. Ananda Social & Education Trust [2020] 114 taxmann.com 693 (SC) ii. [2015] 58 taxmann.com 335 (Rajasthan)/[2015] 2014] iii. CIT v. Vijay Vargiya Vani Charitable Trust 232 Taxman 340 (Rajasthan)/ [2014] 369 ITR 360 (Rajasthan) iv. Abacus Foundation v. CIT. [2017] 88 taxmann.com 661 (Kolkata ITAT) 8 ITA 1092/JP/2019_ Manchan Foundation Vs CIT(E) Similarly held by the ITAT, Bench on consistent basis in many of its decisions in the past including that of Auroveda Integral Foundation v. CIT (Exemption), Jaipur — Appeal No. 988/JP/2016-Order dt. 23.02.2017.[ J…

CIT v. Vijay Vargiya Vani Charitable Trust (369 ITR 360) — Cited in 19 Judgments | BharatTax