TATA MOTORS LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (LTU), MUMBAI
In the result, the appeal is allowed
ITA 3802/MUM/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai15 Apr 2019AY 2011-12
Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh () & Shri N.K. Pradhan () Assessment Year: 2011-12 Tata Motors Ltd. The Commissioner Of Bombay House, 24, Homi Vs. Income-Tax (Ltu), 29Th Mody Street, Hutatma Floor, Centre 1, World Chowk, Mumbai-400001 Trade Centre, Cuffe Parade, Mumbai- 400005. Pan No. Aaact2727Q Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Mr. Rajan Vora, Ar Revenue By : Dr. Manjunath K., Dr Date Of Hearing : 18/01/2019 Date Of Pronouncement : 15/04/2019
For Appellant: Mr. Rajan Vora, ARFor Respondent: Dr. Manjunath K., DR
Section 143(3)Section 263Section 43B
…for provision for leave encashment. It is finally argued that no revisionary proceedings u/s 263 can be allowed on debatable issues for which substantial question of law has been admitted. The Ld. counsel refers to the decision in Udaipur Distillery Co. Ltd. (267 ITR 358) by the Rajasthan High Court, where it has been held that when the matter is pending before the High Court and its outcome will decide whether the deduction is to be given or not, is a debatable issue and the same cannot be revised u/s 263 of the Act. 3.3 On the other hand, the Ld. DR submits that since the decision in Exide Industries (supra) ha…