CIT v. Tata Communications Internet Services Ltd.

251 CTR 290High Court2012#2893 most cited

What is CIT v. Tata Communications Internet Services Ltd. authority for?

Eligibility for deduction under section 10AA is determined at the time of business formation and cannot be re-evaluated for every subsequent year the deduction is claimed.

41

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2016 to 2025.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Tata Communications Internet Services Ltd. · 251 CTR 290 · Section 10AA · Section 80IA(10) · deduction eligibility · year of business formation · subsequent year deduction · Special Economic Zone

Sections most often in play

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT v. Tata Communications Internet Services Ltd.

LANCO SOLAR (GUJARAT) PRIVATE LIMITED ,HYDERABAD vs. ITO., WARD-16(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 906/HYD/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad27 Nov 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Vice-A N D Shri Manjunatha, G. & आ.अपी.सं /Ita Nos. 905 & 906/Hyd/2024 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2017-18 & 2018-19) Lanco Solar (Gujarat) Vs. Income Tax Officer Private Limited, Hyderabad Ward 16(1) Pan:Aabcl1095J Hyderabad (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee By: Shri Rakesh Joshi, Ca राज" व "ारा/Revenue By:: Shri Gudimella V P Pavan Kumar, Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 13/11/2024 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: 27/11/2024 आदेश/Order

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Joshi, CAFor Respondent: : Shri Gudimella V P Pavan
Section 80I

…he decision of the Hon'ble Madras High Court in the case of CIT vs. Heartland KV Information Ltd, reported in 359 ITR 1 (Mad.) as well as the judgment of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of CIT vs. Tata Communications Internet Services Ltd reported in 251 CTR 290 (Del.) and submitted that the Hon'ble Delhi High Court has considered an identical issue of 80IA and held that a mere change of ownership/ pattern of shareholding does not make any difference for the benefit u/s 80IA of the Act available to the undertaking because the undertaking continue to carry on business without any re-construction of busine…

LANCO SOLAR (GUJARAT) PRIVATE LIMITED ,HYDERABAD vs. ITO., WARD-16(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 905/HYD/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad27 Nov 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Vice-A N D Shri Manjunatha, G. & आ.अपी.सं /Ita Nos. 905 & 906/Hyd/2024 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2017-18 & 2018-19) Lanco Solar (Gujarat) Vs. Income Tax Officer Private Limited, Hyderabad Ward 16(1) Pan:Aabcl1095J Hyderabad (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee By: Shri Rakesh Joshi, Ca राज" व "ारा/Revenue By:: Shri Gudimella V P Pavan Kumar, Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 13/11/2024 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: 27/11/2024 आदेश/Order

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Joshi, CAFor Respondent: : Shri Gudimella V P Pavan
Section 80I

…he decision of the Hon'ble Madras High Court in the case of CIT vs. Heartland KV Information Ltd, reported in 359 ITR 1 (Mad.) as well as the judgment of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of CIT vs. Tata Communications Internet Services Ltd reported in 251 CTR 290 (Del.) and submitted that the Hon'ble Delhi High Court has considered an identical issue of 80IA and held that a mere change of ownership/ pattern of shareholding does not make any difference for the benefit u/s 80IA of the Act available to the undertaking because the undertaking continue to carry on business without any re-construction of busine…

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CORPORATE CIRCLE 1(1), CHENNAI vs. POOL THEVAR MARIMUTHU, CHENNAI

In the result, appeal filed by the revenue for assessment year 2014-15 is dismissed

ITA 1421/CHNY/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 May 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Aby T Varkey, Hon’Ble & Shri S. R. Raghunatha, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 1421/Chny/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2014-15 Pool Thevar Marimuthu, Deputy Commissioner Of V. Old No. 54, New No. 23, Income-Tax, Defence Colony, Corporate Circle -1(1), Ekkattuthangal, Chennai. Chennai – 600 032. [Pan: Aanpm-5361-M] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By : Shri. V. Nandakumar, Cit ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri. Y. Sridhar, Fca सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 09.05.2024 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 29.05.2024 आदेश /O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri. V. Nandakumar, CITFor Respondent: Shri. Y. Sridhar, FCA
Section 801CSection 80I

…unications Ltd (SC) [2021] 282 Taxmann 462 (SC), wherein the Supreme Court has decided the issue on Section 80IA of the Act, which is in pari materia with section 80IC(4), wherein the Apex Court has confirmed the order of the Delhi Delhi High Court in [(2012) 251 CTR 290 (Del)] dated 08.08.2021. The Delhi High Court in its order had held as under: "the bar as provided under section 80IA(3) is to be considered only for the first year of the claim for deduction u/s 80 IA. Once the assessee is able to show that it has used new plants and machinery which has not been previously used for any purpose and the new under…

Showing 120 of 41 · Page 1 of 3