CIT v. Sunil Aggarwal
64 Taxmann.com 107High Court2015#952 most cited
What is CIT v. Sunil Aggarwal authority for?
An addition based solely on an assessee's admission during a Section 132 search, which is subsequently retracted with a verifiable explanation, is not justified if the Assessing Officer fails to accept the explanation and adds the amount as unexplained cash credit.
113
judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2016 to 2026.
Also referred to as
CIT v. Sunil Aggarwal · Section 132 · Section 132(4) · retracted statement · admission during search · surrender of income · undisclosed income · unexplained cash credit · addition unjustified · search assessment · evidence retraction
Also reported as
237 Taxmann 512
Sections most often in play
Issues it is cited on
Judgments citing CIT v. Sunil Aggarwal
Showing 1–20 of 113 · Page 1 of 6