SINHGAD TECHNICAL EDUCATION SOCIETY,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,,
Accordingly, additional ground No.3 by the assessee is allowed
ITA 2077/PUN/2014[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Pune17 Oct 2018AY 2008-09
Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos. 2075 To 2077 & 2110/Pun/2014 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2007-08 To 2009-10 Sinhgad Technical Education Society, S. No. 44/1, Vadgaon ( Budruk), Off. Sinhagad Road, Pune-411 041. Pan : Aabts9900Q. …....अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S.
For Appellant: Shri S. N. DoshiFor Respondent: Shri Rajeev Kumar
Section 11Section 13(1)(d)Section 143(3)Section 153C
…,000/- per month and these had to be considered even by very conservative standards. Considering these facts, the benefit accruing to him by way of rent was very meager. The decision of the Hon'ble Madras High Court In CIT vs. Society of Immaculate Conception 241 ITR 193, is relied upon. This issue too was considered by CIT(A)-II, Pune while deciding the appellant's case for AY 2006-07. Having considered the argument, the Ld. CIT(A) observed as follows: “The Assessing Officer has also questioned the justification given by the appellant that Shri M.N. Navale due to his yeomen service rendered to the society, was…